Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3020078.3021751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

120-core microAptiv MIPS Overlay for the Terasic DE5-NET FPGA board

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The synchronous version offers slightly better performance as it has fewer software overheads, but it will be interesting to monitor this comparison in future as the size of our cluster grows and the cost of global synchronisation increases. [24] which adapts an existing 32-bit MIPS core (from the Imagination Technologies Academic Program) for the DE5-Net FPGA, and adds support for lightweight intercore messaging over a Hoplite NoC [25]. A side-by-side comparison against Tinsel is shown in Figure 13.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The synchronous version offers slightly better performance as it has fewer software overheads, but it will be interesting to monitor this comparison in future as the size of our cluster grows and the cost of global synchronisation increases. [24] which adapts an existing 32-bit MIPS core (from the Imagination Technologies Academic Program) for the DE5-Net FPGA, and adds support for lightweight intercore messaging over a Hoplite NoC [25]. A side-by-side comparison against Tinsel is shown in Figure 13.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13. Feature set of the Tinsel overlay versus the µaptive overlay[24], including clock frequencies and area requirements on the DE5-Net board.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if the final chip is looked at under a microscope, one can hardly see the original fine-grained structure. And if we talk about the implementation of a NoC on an FPGA chip (which has already reached such sizes that it can fit a network of tens and hundreds of nodes [20]), then it is even more difficult to maintain the initial abstraction in it with the representation of individual macroblocks in the form of rectangles due to uneven distribution of chip resources on the FPGA die area. Also, the simplification that the main connection routes between routers pass between macroblocks does not correspond to reality because the chip is initially multilayered, and the connections go through several metal layers.…”
Section: Topological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of courses is beyond the initial scope of MIPSfpga but, as we stated previously, lecturers have the freedom to adapt the contents of the Getting Started package to their own needs. As an example, the authors in [22] have engaged in some heavy modifications of the source code of the microAptiv core contained in the MIPSfpga system to develop a 120‐core system that then can be downloaded onto a Terasic DE5‐NET FPGA.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%