1978
DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(78)90359-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

120. The influence of genetic factors and antigen dose on IgE production in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold dose of OA, 0.1-1 ¡ig, for a primary tissue response to be induced in SD rats with Al(OHfi is very similar to that reported for induction of OAIgE-antibody responses in many rat strains [2,13,[25][26][27], Although SD rats are generally not considered as high OA-IgE-antibody producers [2,26,32], but com pare [28], they turned out to be good responders in the present system provided that suitable adjuvant condi tions were chosen. Consistent lung tissue, tracheal, and serosal mast cell responses in general seemed to be induced at the same immunization dose of OA, but unexpectedly the temporal pattern of development and the magnitude of the responses tended to disso ciate under various conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The threshold dose of OA, 0.1-1 ¡ig, for a primary tissue response to be induced in SD rats with Al(OHfi is very similar to that reported for induction of OAIgE-antibody responses in many rat strains [2,13,[25][26][27], Although SD rats are generally not considered as high OA-IgE-antibody producers [2,26,32], but com pare [28], they turned out to be good responders in the present system provided that suitable adjuvant condi tions were chosen. Consistent lung tissue, tracheal, and serosal mast cell responses in general seemed to be induced at the same immunization dose of OA, but unexpectedly the temporal pattern of development and the magnitude of the responses tended to disso ciate under various conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…It is difficult to know the exact reasons for the difference, but this highlights the usefulness of examining different systems before making firm conclusions about immunoregulatory mechanisms. One difference may be that our experiments were performed in the Brown Norway rat, which seems to favor Th2 responses and thus has been used successfully in a variety of other Th2 systems (22)(23)(24). Many features of Th2 asthma occur in this rat model (4 -6, 25), including adoptive transfer of BHR and airway eosinophilia by CD4 ϩ T cells (4,6,7) and by allergen-specific Th2 lines, as shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brown Norway rat is a useful model for studying Th2 responses such as helminthic parasite infestations (22), IgE production (23), drug allergies (24), and asthma. Sensitization with OVA followed by OVA airway challenge leads to eosinophilic airway inflammation, local infiltration of activated Th2 cells, and BHR (4,5,25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently many researchers have reported that BN rats are high responders to IgE antibody production [22][23][24] and suitable animals for investigating the mechanism Effect of HSR-609 on Late Phase Nasal Eosinophilia of airway hyperresponsiveness [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Moreover, the symptoms of experimental asthma in BN rats are similar to human bronchial asthma in terms of the appearance of IPR and LPR and airway hyperresponsiveness with an accumulation of inflammatory cells in the airways after exposure to antigen [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some investigators have reported that chemotactic factors such as platelet-activating factor, leukotriene B 4 and interleukin-5 (IL-5) may play an important role in the infiltration of eosinophils [16][17][18][19][20][21]. In the present study, we investigated an allergic late phase eosinophilia model in BN rats that were high responders to IgE antibody production [22][23][24] and were observed not only for IPR and LPR but also airway hyperresponsiveness with accumulation of proinflammatory cells after antigen exposure [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%