2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1243P Pathologic response as early endpoint for survival following neoadjuvant therapy (NEO-AT) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (rNSCLC): Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase III trial CheckMate-816 showed promising results that the pathological complete response (pCR) was 24%, compared with 2.2 percent in the chemotherapy alone arm. (7). A recent pooled analysis showed that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy may improve efficacy outcomes over immunotherapy alone (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase III trial CheckMate-816 showed promising results that the pathological complete response (pCR) was 24%, compared with 2.2 percent in the chemotherapy alone arm. (7). A recent pooled analysis showed that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy may improve efficacy outcomes over immunotherapy alone (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to performing a standard meta-analysis of studies evaluating pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy and long-term clinical outcomes in NSCLC 5 —where once again a strong and favorable association with survival was noted—we have included more in-depth IPD analysis to further characterize this relationship. By extracting IPD and reconstructing KMCs from available studies, we are better able to capture the significant association between pCR and long-term clinical outcomes of EFS and OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have suggested the positive correlation between pathologic response, including pCR and MPR, and more established clinical end points, such as event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). 5 Nevertheless, questions have been raised over the appropriateness of these pathologic end points as surrogates for long-term clinical outcomes. Therefore, further research is needed to effectively quantify the association between pathologic responses, such as pCR, and long-term outcomes, including EFS and OS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Many patients with early-stage NSCLC receive perioperative (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) chemotherapy, which provides only a modest improvement in 5-year overall survival. 39,40 Retrospective 41,42 and small-scale prospective studies, [43][44][45] as well as a more recently reported large meta-analysis, 46 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC have shown the ability of MPR and pCR after neoadjuvant therapy to predict clinical benefit as measured by improved long-term outcomes. Before the most recent phase III CheckMate-816 trial evaluating neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy in localized NSCLC, the rates of MPR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have ranged between 6.7% and 27%, with the median frequency of pCR across studies reported to be on the order of 4%.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy For Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%