1990
DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(90)90091-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

137Cs Determination and mutagenicity tests in wild Mus musculus domesticus before and after the Chernobyl accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
2
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] to be 3.6 ϫ 10 Ϫ5 mGy/d, compared to the maximum of 86 mGy/d in our study ( Table 2). What is not obvious from our study is why, at doses that were 2.4 million times greater, we do not detect levels of chromosomal damage similar to those previously reported [1][2][3]20]. In addition to an analysis of the raw data, scientific investigations require an analysis of methods and experimental design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20] to be 3.6 ϫ 10 Ϫ5 mGy/d, compared to the maximum of 86 mGy/d in our study ( Table 2). What is not obvious from our study is why, at doses that were 2.4 million times greater, we do not detect levels of chromosomal damage similar to those previously reported [1][2][3]20]. In addition to an analysis of the raw data, scientific investigations require an analysis of methods and experimental design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The animals included in our study were chronically exposed to radiation levels that were far greater than those examined by prior investigators, yet Cris‐taldi et al [1] and Goncharova and Ryabokon [2] reported significant increases in chromosomal damage. Using the equation from Chesser et al [4] for conversion of Bq/g to an estimate of absorbed dose of 137 Cs in small mammals, we estimated the maximum dose for the population sampled by Cristaldi et al [20] to be 3.6 × 10 −5 mGy/d, compared to the maximum of 86 mGy/d in our study (Table 2). What is not obvious from our study is why, at doses that were 2.4 million times greater, we do not detect levels of chromosomal damage similar to those previously reported [1–3,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Levels of contamination and dose rate estimates reported here would be expected to confer considerable insult to genetic material by ionizing radiation. Genetic damage and elevated rates of chromosomal aberrations has been reported for animals [9,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and exposed humans [40][41][42] from the Chornobyl region. Elevated mutation rates were reported for a mitochondrial gene for rodents from Chornobyl [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between genotoxicants and permanent, transmissible genetic changes in organisms is unclear [36][37][38][39], but most studies have shown that some damage to DNA is associated with radiation [19,36,[40][41][42][43][44]. For humans, a definite health risk has been established for exposure to particular doses of radiation [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%