2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(12)61409-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1398 Brivanib Versus Placebo in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc) Who Failed or Were Intolerant to Sorafenib: Results From the Phase 3 Brisk-Ps Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It showed a higher overall response rate (ORR) (11.5 vs 1.9%) and a longer median TTP (4.3 vs 2.7 months; p = 0.0001), but did not significantly improve OS (9.4 vs 8.2 months; p = 0.33) [58].…”
Section: The Improvement Of Previous Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It showed a higher overall response rate (ORR) (11.5 vs 1.9%) and a longer median TTP (4.3 vs 2.7 months; p = 0.0001), but did not significantly improve OS (9.4 vs 8.2 months; p = 0.33) [58].…”
Section: The Improvement Of Previous Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this Asiatic study, lapatinib has been evaluated in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in pretreated HER2 amplified aGCs. OS improvement was not statistically significant in the intention-to-treat population (11.0 vs 8.9 months; HR: 0.84; p = 0.2088) Sorafenib [53] VEGFR Tivozanib [54] Gastric cancer HER2 Lapatinib [66,67] EGFR Erlotinib [61,62] Gefitinib c-MET Foretinib [86] Rilotumumab [87,93] Onartuzumab [88] Hepatocellular carcinoma VEGFR, BRAF, KIT, RET, PDGFR Sunitinib Linifanib [55,56] FGFR Brivanib [57,58] EGFR Erlotinib [59] mTOR Temsirolimus [60] c-MET Foretinib [82] Tivantinib [83] Cabozantinib [84] MEK Selumetinib [89,90] IGF/IGFR Cixutumumab [91] The role of targeted therapy for GI tumors Review informahealthcare.com while in the Chinese subgroup of HER2-positive patients, this improvement was higher [67]. In many Phase II trials, the association of cetuximab with chemotherapy has been shown to have some efficacy [68,69] and based on the increase of RR in previous studies, Richards et al evaluated in a Phase II trial the combination of cetuximab and chemotherapy with docetaxel plus oxaliplatin (DOCOX) versus chemotherapy alone in patients affected with metastatic gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: The Improvement Of Previous Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, brivanib, which targets VEGFR, PDGFR and FGFR, also failed to prolong OS (Table 1) in a phase III trial conducted to investigate its efficacy as a first line therapy even though it had a more favorable toxicity profile than sorafenib [89,90]. Moreover, another phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy of brivanib after sorafenib failure and the authors reported that, in comparison to placebo, brivanib resulted in a longer median TTP but insignificant increase in the OS (Table 1) [91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108].…”
Section: Anti-angiogenic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SUN trial was discontinued in 2010 after early data showed sunitinib was inferior to sorafenib in terms of OS and was more toxic [Cheng et al 2011]. In December 2011, the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and fibroblast growth factor receptor targeted agent, brivanib, was reported to show no improvement in OS over placebo when given as second-line therapy in the Brivanib Study in HCC Patients at Risk Post Sorafenib (BRISK-PS) trial [Llovet et al 2012], and in 2012 the Brivanib Study in HCC Patients at Risk First Line (BRISK-FL) trial of brivanib as first-line therapy also failed to meet its primary OS endpoint [BMS, 2012].…”
Section: Search: Adding Erlotinib To Sorafenib Provides No Benefitmentioning
confidence: 99%