2001
DOI: 10.2307/1224746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(1509) Proposal to conserve the name Centaurea (Compositae) with a conserved type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation of the genus Acosta resulted from a split of the heterogeneous genus Centaurea as proposed by Löve and Löve (1961a) and followed by other authors (Holub 1972(Holub , 1973(Holub , 1974Soják 1972;Dostál 1973). Following recent molecular phylogenetic studies in Centaurea (Susanna et al 1995;Wagenitz and Hellwig 1996;Garcia-Jacas et al 2000, 2001, 2006, new generic limits were suggested (Greuter et al 2001). A separate genus Rhaponticoides Vaill., previously known as Centaurea sect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The separation of the genus Acosta resulted from a split of the heterogeneous genus Centaurea as proposed by Löve and Löve (1961a) and followed by other authors (Holub 1972(Holub , 1973(Holub , 1974Soják 1972;Dostál 1973). Following recent molecular phylogenetic studies in Centaurea (Susanna et al 1995;Wagenitz and Hellwig 1996;Garcia-Jacas et al 2000, 2001, 2006, new generic limits were suggested (Greuter et al 2001). A separate genus Rhaponticoides Vaill., previously known as Centaurea sect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is phylogenetically distinct from the generic core and includes the original type species of the genus Centaurea (Greuter 2003;Greuter et al 2005). Therefore, a proposal was published and later approved, to conserve the name Centaurea with a new type, namely C. paniculata L. (Greuter et al 2001;Brummitt 2004), a species traditionally placed in Acosta. Following this treatment, the name Acosta could not be applied for a separate genus, even if a narrow concept of the genus Centaurea is applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although precedent exists to conserve the name of a large genus with a new type, e.g., Hedysarum (Choi & Ohashi, 1998;Brummitt, 2000) and Centaurea (Greuter & al. 2001;Brummitt, 2004b), the individual circumstances of such cases must be carefully examined, particularly regarding the impact on the taxon that stands to lose the use of the original type.…”
Section: Precedentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Centaurea is one of the largest in the Asteraceae, containing between 400 or even 700 species (Wagenitz & Hellwig 1996;Greuter et al 2001) distributed mainly in the Old World and has been well studied for its taxonomy, nomenclature, and problems of species delimitation (Bremer 1994;Vanderhoeven et al 2002;Koutecky 2007;Susanna & Garcia-Jacas 2007Vonica & Cantor 2011). It follows, therefore, that these species are difficult to identify because of their morphological variability and ability to hybridize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%