1539: Comparison of Light Spot Hydrophone (LSHD) and Fiber Optic Probe Hydrophone (FOPH) for Lithotripter Field Characterization

Simmons, W. Neal; Zhou, Yufeng; Qin, Jun Qi; Sankin, Georgy; Cocks, F. H.; Preminger, Glenn M.; Zhong, Pei; Fehr, J.-N.; Granz, B.; Nanke, Ralf

doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(18)33743-1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…29,30 A laser light source at the rear side of a quartz block (in air) was focused into a small spot (50 lm) on the front side, which was immersed in water perpendicular to the propagation path of LSWs, and the reflected laser light was picked up by a broad bandwidth photo detector. Pressure waveform can then be calculated using a program provided by the manufacturer.…”

Section: Pressure Field Mappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reduction of Bubble Cavitation by Modifying the Diffraction Wave from a Lithotripter Aperture

Zhou

2012

Journal of Endourology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: A new method was devised to suppress the bubble cavitation in the lithotripter focal zone to reduce the propensity of shockwave-induced renal injury. Materials and Methods: An edge extender was designed and fabricated to fit on the outside of the ellipsoidal reflector of an electrohydraulic lithotripter to disturb the generation of diffraction wave at the aperture, but with little effect on the acoustic field inside the reflector. Results: Although the peak negative pressures at the lithotripter focus using the edge extender at 20 kV were similar to that of the original configuration (-11.1 -0.9 vs -10.6 -0.7 MPa), the duration of the tensile wave was shortened significantly (3.2 -0.54 vs 5.83 -0.56 ls, P < 0.01). There is no difference, however, in both the amplitude and duration of the compressive shockwaves between these two configurations as well as the -6 dB beam width in the focal plane. The significant suppression effect of bubble cavitation was confirmed by the measured bubble collapse time using passive cavitation detection. At the lithotripter focus, while only about 30 shocks were needed to rupture a blood vessel phantom using the original HM-3 reflector at 20 kV, no damage could be produced after 300 shocks using the edge extender. Meanwhile, the original HM-3 lithotripter at 20 kV can achieve a stone comminution efficiency of 50.4 -2.0% on plaster-of-Paris stone phantom after 200 shocks, which is comparable to that of using the edge extender (46.8 -4.1%, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Modifying the diffraction wave at the lithotripter aperture can suppress the shockwave-induced bubble cavitation with significant reduced damage potential on the vessel phantom but satisfactory stone comminution ability.

show abstract

Section: Pressure Field Mappingmentioning

confidence: 99%