Selected Papers of Charles H. Best 1963
DOI: 10.3138/9781442656918-021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

17. A Study of the Prevalence of Diabetes in an Ontario Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications of the high total prevalence of hyperglycemia are discussed. Diabetes 39:1131- 37,1990 S everal community studies have assessed the prevalence of diabetes with various methods for identifying and defining diabetes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Studies in Massachusetts used postprandial blood glucose to confirm the status of previously known diabetic individuals and to identify diabetic individuals who were previously unknown (1,5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications of the high total prevalence of hyperglycemia are discussed. Diabetes 39:1131- 37,1990 S everal community studies have assessed the prevalence of diabetes with various methods for identifying and defining diabetes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Studies in Massachusetts used postprandial blood glucose to confirm the status of previously known diabetic individuals and to identify diabetic individuals who were previously unknown (1,5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redhead (1960), in Newcastle, found it to be 0.95%. Kenny et al (1951), in Canada, found it to be 1.2%, and with Wilkerson and Krall (1947) it was 1.4%. The newly discovered cases were also approximately in the numbers to be expected from other surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the survey of Wilkerson and Krall (1947) and of Kenny, Chute, and Best (1951) postprandial blood sugars were taken as well as urine specimens, but the incidence of discovered abnormality was 0.6% and 0.5% respectively in the tested populations. It appears that a meal is considerably less provocative of hyperglycaemia than a 50-g. dose of glucose taken fasting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%