2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.remngl.2011.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-FDG-PET/CT in the surveillance of patients with lymphoma: Detection of asymptomatic recurrences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve this, Kurtoğlu and Göçer 10 compared 2 patient groups: (1) patients with a history of lymphoma and chemotherapy who had concerning Waldeyer ring/nasopharynx findings on follow‐up PET/CT but benign tonsil biopsy results and (2) patients with concerning Waldeyer ring/nasopharynx PET/CT findings performed during workup for an unknown primary but with subsequent malignant biopsy findings. Note that, in contrast to our study, the patient cohort with malignant findings did not have a history of lymphoma or chemotherapy exposure, 10 2 factors known to alter the reliability of PET/CT scans and FDG uptake 2,3 . Therefore, the guidelines that Kurtoğlu and Göçer proposed are likely not applicable to the patient cohort described herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To achieve this, Kurtoğlu and Göçer 10 compared 2 patient groups: (1) patients with a history of lymphoma and chemotherapy who had concerning Waldeyer ring/nasopharynx findings on follow‐up PET/CT but benign tonsil biopsy results and (2) patients with concerning Waldeyer ring/nasopharynx PET/CT findings performed during workup for an unknown primary but with subsequent malignant biopsy findings. Note that, in contrast to our study, the patient cohort with malignant findings did not have a history of lymphoma or chemotherapy exposure, 10 2 factors known to alter the reliability of PET/CT scans and FDG uptake 2,3 . Therefore, the guidelines that Kurtoğlu and Göçer proposed are likely not applicable to the patient cohort described herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“… 13 However, it should be noted that the elevated SUVs in this specific patient population are likely due to a combination of factors, rather than just chemotherapy alone; this is supported by the significantly higher SUVs in our study cohort as compared with the control cohort, who completed chemotherapy but did not have a lymphoma diagnosis. In addition to chemotherapy, factors contributing to the elevated SUVs may include a history of lymphoma, 3 previous radiation treatment, 2 and the high avidity of the tonsils on PET/CT at baseline that leads to a high degree of SUV variability. 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations