2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1st ACT global trajectory optimisation competition: Results found at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17] MALTO also played a key role in JPL's winning entry for the Global Trajectory Optimization Competition. 18…”
Section: Testing and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17] MALTO also played a key role in JPL's winning entry for the Global Trajectory Optimization Competition. 18…”
Section: Testing and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for the arrival conditions at Venus we use objective function in Eq. (14), with ω l = 1, while for the arrival conditions at Mercury (last level) the objective function was: (15) whereṽ is the spacecraft velocity relative to Mercury at arrival. The pruning functions were selected based on the required effect of the gravity-assist maneuvers.…”
Section: Fig 5 Solutions Found By De A) and Mbh B) Over All 100 Runsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in order for a kinetic impactor to deliver collisional energies greater than 1000 J/kg it would need an impact mass of more than 50 tons and relative velocity larger than 50 km/s. Considering retrograde trajectories, impact velocities of at least 60 km/s are possible [25] even without using advanced propulsion concepts [26] . Therefore, assuming impact velocities close to 50 km/s only a few tons of impact mass would be required to provide a collisional energy on the order of 100 J/kg.…”
Section: B Kinetic Impactor and Nuclear Interceptormentioning
confidence: 99%