2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1st Workshop on Upper-Extremity Assistive Technology for People with Duchenne: State of the art, emerging avenues, and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OTs), and increase the ability to communicate in the same, uniform terminology. Knowledge regarding factors affecting use and benefit has increased in literature, but is still insufficient to match human related intended use to the product related intended use [18]. This includes insight into aspects located in the various RiFA steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OTs), and increase the ability to communicate in the same, uniform terminology. Knowledge regarding factors affecting use and benefit has increased in literature, but is still insufficient to match human related intended use to the product related intended use [18]. This includes insight into aspects located in the various RiFA steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a way, this is peculiar as upper limb function – the ability to reach, lift, and manipulate – is important for the preservation of independent functioning and more difficult to replace by using assistive devices than lower limb function. Young males with DMD indicate that activities which require arm function – like self‐feeding, personal care, using computers, and manoeuvring wheelchairs – are among their highest priorities …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, force-based control interfaces with active gravity and jointstiffness compensation can be a better alternative for those cases in which voluntary forces would still be higher than the intrinsic forces of the arms. Fully passive or actively adjustable passive arm supports are in most cases not effective for people with severe muscular weakness such as adults with DMD [42]. This specific group of people are generally too weak to use arm supports since they cannot generate the forces needed to overcome the intrinsic forces of their arms, or the inertia and friction forces of the device [105,104].…”
Section: Summary Of Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42]) with people with DMD, care givers, rehabilitation physicians, and manufacturers of arm supports, three major limitations of current arm supports were identified:…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation