2012
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggs035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-D reconstruction of boundaries with level set inversion of traveltimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level‐set method was originally developed by Osher and Sethian (1988) to determine the front propagation between two boundaries. This method has been successfully applied to non‐geophysical and geophysical applications such as in the two‐dimensional reconstruction of sharp boundaries in cross‐borehole tomography (Zheglova et al, 2013). It is important to note that we have not been able to come up with a precise rule on the number of subsets of fronts to be created and the number of flow lines to use.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level‐set method was originally developed by Osher and Sethian (1988) to determine the front propagation between two boundaries. This method has been successfully applied to non‐geophysical and geophysical applications such as in the two‐dimensional reconstruction of sharp boundaries in cross‐borehole tomography (Zheglova et al, 2013). It is important to note that we have not been able to come up with a precise rule on the number of subsets of fronts to be created and the number of flow lines to use.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We work in an optimization framework, and overcome determination issues by restricting optimization over a prior or model subspace of functions and adding to the misfit functional a regularization functional. For piecewise constant slowness function we seek the interfaces between values defined by finite parameters [25,39], or with a finite basis [20] or infinite dimensional subspace [54,36]. One may use a probabilistic frame [51,29,13], where the prior is a space of probability distributions, but this is not within our scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest choice α = 2 is problematic because s ∈ A ⊂ H 1 (Ω) does not give a well posed forward problem. A natural regularization for a binary recovery problem is to penalize the interfaces between constant values [45], (also [54,55]). If s ∈ BV (Ω, {a, b}), we can interpret (3.1) with α = 1 as the total variation of s, that is, the perimeter of the set {s = a}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of geophysical inverse problems, the level-set method has also found its wide applications, and the following citations are by no means complete. In [13], the level-set method was first applied to the gravity data; in [27] it was applied to identify uncertainties in the shape of geophysical objects using temperature measurements; in [41], [19] and [20] it was applied to travel-time tomography problems in different settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%