2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2017.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-Segal sets and the Waldhausen construction

Abstract: In a previous paper, we showed that a discrete version of the S•-construction gives an equivalence of categories between unital 2-Segal sets and augmented stable double categories. Here, we generalize this result to the homotopical setting, by showing that there is a Quillen equivalence between a model category for unital 2-Segal objects and a model category for augmented stable double Segal objects which is given by an S•-construction. We show that this equivalence fits together with the result in the discret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We furthermore require this bisimplicial ∞groupoid to be stable, see Section 2.3. This stability condition is a pullback condition on certain squares, and is a ∞-categorical reformulation of the notion of Bergner-Osorno-Ozornova-Rovelli-Scheimbauer [6], suitable for ∞-groupoids.…”
Section: Outline Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We furthermore require this bisimplicial ∞groupoid to be stable, see Section 2.3. This stability condition is a pullback condition on certain squares, and is a ∞-categorical reformulation of the notion of Bergner-Osorno-Ozornova-Rovelli-Scheimbauer [6], suitable for ∞-groupoids.…”
Section: Outline Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.3.2. Bergner, Osorno, Ozornova, Rovelli, and Scheimbauer introduced the notion of stable double category (bisimplicial set) in [6]: they define a double category to be stable if every square is uniquely determined by its span of source morphisms and, independently by its cospan of target morphisms. The present definition is a categorical reformulation of their notion suitable for ∞-groupoids.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the restriction species of R-substructures of X. See Bergner et al [5] for examples of slices of the decomposition space of graphs. The fact that slicing a restriction species produces again restriction species reflects the local nature of coalgebras: every element in a coalgebra generates a coalgebra.…”
Section: Slices Of Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A map operates as a function on the set of dots when considered a map in ∆ while it operates as a function on the walls when considered a map in ∆ gen . Here is a picture of a certain map 5 → 4 in ∆ and of the corresponding map [5] ← [4] in ∆ gen .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key source of examples of such structures is the output of Waldhausen's S • -construction when applied to an exact category, as shown in [DK12] and [GCKT18]. In [BOORS18] and [BOORS] we show that any 2-Segal space which satisfies a unitality condition arises from such a construction for a suitably general input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%