2020 IDEOM Annual Meeting: Actinic Keratosis Stakeholders Survey Identifies Gaps in Research and Care

Babalola, Folawiyo; Moattari, Cameron R.; Berman, Brian; Bhatia, Neal; Goldberg, Leonard Harry; Gottlieb, Alice B.; Grada, Ayman; Hanke, C. William; Jagdeo, Jared; Jimenez, Xochitl; Konnikov, Nellie; Martin, George M.; Maytin, Edward V.; Milane, Michael; Nestor, Mark S.; Noda, Aliene; Rosén, Ted; Shah, Sana; Willey, Andrea; Yoo, Jane Y.; Zeitouni, Nathalie C.; Siegel, Daniël J.

doi:10.36849/jdd.6360

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow diagram of the selection criteria. A total of 1398 studies were screened, and 249 studies (17.8%) were ultimately included in the database …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication Trends of Qualitative Research in Dermatology

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ImportanceQualitative studies serve as a tool for dermatologists and researchers in dermatology to engage with and understand perspectives of populations with different cultures and backgrounds.ObjectiveTo assess (1) current approaches to qualitative dermatologic research and (2) the publication trends of these studies with the aim to inform researchers regarding qualitative research and its significance and applicability in the field of dermatology.Evidence ReviewA scoping review was conducted in which PubMed and CINAHL Plus were searched using dermatology AND qualitative, dermatology, and 7 qualitative methods terms. Studies were selected for inclusion using 3 levels of screening. Level 1 excluded articles published in a language other than English. Level 2 excluded articles of studies involving mixed methods, quantitative methods, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Level 3 excluded articles that were not specific to general dermatology, medical dermatology, pediatric dermatology, dermatologic surgery, dermatopathology, or education and training associated with dermatology. Finally, all duplicates were removed. The searches were conducted from July 23 to 28, 2022. All articles obtained from PubMed and CINAHL Plus searches were recorded in REDCap.FindingsA total of 1398 articles were reviewed, and of these, 249 (17.8%) were qualitative dermatology studies. Common qualitative methods included content analysis (58 [23.3%]) and grounded theory/constant comparison (35 [14.1%]). Individual interviews were the most common data collection method (198 [79.5%]), and patients (174 [69.9%]) were the most common participant type. Patient experience (137 [55.0%]) was the most common investigated topic. Overall, 131 qualitative studies (52.6%) in dermatology were published in dermatology journals, and 120 qualitative studies (48.2%) in dermatology were published between 2020 and 2022.Conclusions and RelevanceQualitative research in dermatology is becoming more prevalent. There is value in qualitative research, and we encourage researchers in dermatology to incorporate qualitative methods in their studies.

show abstract

“…Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow diagram of the selection criteria. A total of 1398 studies were screened, and 249 studies (17.8%) were ultimately included in the database …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%