22. Decision 34/2014. (XI. 14.) – Foreign Currency Loan

Gárdos, Péter; Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina

doi:10.5771/9783748929826-393

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…poza kodeksem -prowadzi do dezintegracji systemu prawa zobowiązań, co jest działaniem niekorzystnym dla systemu prawa i niesie ryzyko jego niespójności 8 . Co więcej, trafna jest także propozycja zawarta w Projekcie 1, by umowa franczyzy została uregulowana w nowym tytule XXIV 1 w księdze trzeciej Kodeksu cywilnego -między umową komisu a przewozu (umowa agencyjna uregulowana jest w tytule XXIII) 9 . W tej kwestii należy więc zgłosić krytyczne uwagi do Projektu 2, w którym zaproponowano ujęcie regulacji w odrębnej ustawie.…”

Section: Miejsce Regulacji Umowy Franczyzyunclassified

Uwagi do projektu ustawy o działalności franczyzowej

Jelonek-Jarco¹

2023

PwD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the paper is to present comments to the second draft of the franchise agreement regulation proposed by Rafał Adamus. Undoubtedly, the franchise agreement requires statutory regulation, hence the solutions to be adopted in the planned act are very important. The study discusses the issue of the place of regulation of the franchise agreement (the Civil Code or a separate act), the definition of this agreement, the regulation of the agreement taking into account the Act on Combating Unfair Competition of 16 April 1993, the essence and content of the information prepared by the franchise network organizer, the rights and obligations of the parties of the agreement, the advisability of introducing regulations on practices infringing the collective interests of franchisees and intertemporal rules. The paper contains suggestions concerning additional solutions in the planned regulation, e.g. about issues related to the sub franchise agreements, the rules of joint (and several) liability of the franchisee and the franchisor towards third parties, overriding provisions and regulation regarding the obligation of the parties to the contract to care for the good name of the franchisor and the entire network. The study is to be an incentive for further intensive work on the statutory regulation of the franchise agreement.

show abstract

Section: Miejsce Regulacji Umowy Franczyzyunclassified

Uwagi do projektu ustawy o działalności franczyzowej

Jelonek-Jarco¹

2023

PwD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Confused Constitutionalism in Hungary—New Assessment Criteria for Recognising a Populist Constitutional Court

Gárdos-Orosz

2024

Hague J Rule Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The starting point of the paper is that the early constitutional changes after the populist transformation of Hungarian majority state politics (from 2010) and the application of the new Fundamental Law (since 2012) have created difficulty in achieving constitutional justice by judicial means. The fundamental populist constitutional transformation and, within this, the transformation of the regulation of the Constitutional Court have created great challenges for constitutional adjudication. Scholarship on the transformation of the Hungarian Constitutional Court regards the change of jurisprudence as a consequence of the constitutional environment, which ended up in institutional state capture. Basing my arguments on the classic competence-related issues of constitutional justice, activism and deference, I argue here that for constitutional courts, there is always a limited room for manoeuvre by interpretation except for in a ‘hard’ dictatorship. Populist Hungarian jurisprudence is, therefore, not only a consequence of constitutional change but a contribution per se—a cause of the construction of a populist constitution. This job has been done by constitutional interpretation in an activist or deferent manner with regard to specific politically sensitive issues. EU- and emergency-related constitutional conflicts are used here as examples to explain the proposed assessment criteria. The conclusion is that either the Court is activist or deferent, it contributes actively to the populist construction by constitutional interpretation.

show abstract

22. Decision 34/2014. (XI. 14.) – Foreign Currency Loan

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Uwagi do projektu ustawy o działalności franczyzowej

Uwagi do projektu ustawy o działalności franczyzowej

Confused Constitutionalism in Hungary—New Assessment Criteria for Recognising a Populist Constitutional Court

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About