2012 International Electron Devices Meeting 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2012.6478971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

22nm High-performance SOI technology featuring dual-embedded stressors, Epi-Plate High-K deep-trench embedded DRAM and self-aligned Via 15LM BEOL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the modeled high capacitance in 3D structures [22], and with the long L (27-33 nm) and high variability that have been the result of doped fully-depleted devices. The deviations in the existing 22 nm FinFET implementation from the ideal FinFET (Table 4) is depicted in Table 5.…”
Section: -Requirements For Scalabilitysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with the modeled high capacitance in 3D structures [22], and with the long L (27-33 nm) and high variability that have been the result of doped fully-depleted devices. The deviations in the existing 22 nm FinFET implementation from the ideal FinFET (Table 4) is depicted in Table 5.…”
Section: -Requirements For Scalabilitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition to the excess capacitance caused by longer L and/or the heavily doped bottom of the FinFET, there is also large parasitic capacitance between gate-source and gate-drain [22]. In a 14 nm technology, at reduce fin pitch and reduced CPP, because of the increased parasitic capacitance and possible increase in variability, at the product level, it will be probably challenging to obtain performance gain (i.e.…”
Section: Impact Implicationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(In order to estimate Eox from published data plotted vs. Vov. the T inv value for the IBM 32 nm was taken from [38]). …”
Section: Process-and Architecture-independent Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commodity DDR3 (2007) [14]; DDR4 (2012) [18] Low-Power LPDDR3 (2012) [17]; LPDDR4 (2014) [20] Graphics GDDR5 (2009) [15] Performance eDRAM [28], [32]; RLDRAM3 (2011) [29] 3D-Stacked WIO (2011) [16]; WIO2 (2014) [21]; MCDRAM (2015) [13]; HBM (2013) [19]; HMC1.0 (2013) [10]; HMC1.1 (2014) [11] Academic SBA/SSA (2010) [38]; Staged Reads (2012) [8]; RAIDR (2012) [27]; SALP (2012) [24]; TL-DRAM (2013) [26]; RowClone (2013) [37]; Half-DRAM (2014) [39]; Row-Buffer Decoupling (2014) [33]; SARP (2014) [6]; AL-DRAM (2015) [25] At the forefront of such innovations should be DRAM simulators, the software tool with which to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each new proposal. However, DRAM simulators have been lagging behind the rapid-fire changes to DRAM.…”
Section: Segment Dram Standards and Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%