29 A Mental Clock Setting Process Reveated by Reaction Times

Rosenbaum, David A.; Patashnik, Oren

doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61964-0

Cited by 15 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study, the RSIs speciWed the onset of the visual response cue and when to respond-information that could have been used for response scheduling. Our results are congruent with previous studies that demonstrated the use of a subtle temporal cue to minimize reaction time in discrete (Quesada & Schmidt, 1970;Rosenbaum & Patashnik, 1980) and continuous reaction time tasks (Willingham et al, 1997) in the laboratory as well as anticipatory scheduling in musical performance (ShaVer, 1981(ShaVer, , 1982(ShaVer, , 1984, sports (Lee et al, 1983), and pedestrian navigation (Rantanen & Xu, 2001).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…A predictable temporal pattern might also allow for eYcient anticipatory scheduling of responses, leading to shorter reaction times. While it is known that people can use information about an expected time interval to minimize reaction time in discrete (Quesada & Schmidt, 1970;Rosenbaum & Patashnik, 1980) or continuous reaction time tasks (Willingham, Greenberg, & Thomas, 1997), whether implicitly learned temporal patterns could also be used for scheduling sequenced actions has not been explored systematically.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The procedural learning of action order is independent of temporal learning

Shin

2007

Psychological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How does learning the timing of actions influence our ability to learn the order of actions? A sequence of responses cued by spatial stimuli was learned in a serial reaction time task where the response-to-stimulus intervals (RSIs) were random, constant, or followed a fixed sequence. In this final sequenced-RSI condition, the response and RSI sequences were consistently matched in phase and could be integrated into a common sequence representation. The main result was that the response sequence was learned to a similar degree in all RSI training conditions, indicating that neither the predictability of RSIs nor the integration of the phase-matched response and timing sequences benefited learning of the response sequence. Nevertheless, temporal learning and integration speeded up performance without strengthening the representation of response order.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The procedural learning of action order is independent of temporal learning

Shin

2007

Psychological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies show more variability in interval duration for longer intervals defined by movement [84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91], and as explained in Schmidt et al [85, p. 422], these findings are expected in extrinsic timing models: 'the mechanism that meters out intervals of time . .…”

Section: (C) Evidence For Extrinsic Timingmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…Single-timed interval production, where participants reproduce a single interval to match the duration of a model, using, e.g. taps [86,87,90,94], for intervals ranging from 0 to 1050 ms. 2. Movements made to a metronome: for moving a stylus to and from a target, with interbeat intervals from 200 to 500 ms [85].…”

Section: (C) Evidence For Extrinsic Timingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Timing in talking: what is it used for, and how is it controlled?

Turk

Shattuck‐Hufnagel

2014

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the first part of the paper, we summarize the linguistic factors that shape speech timing patterns, including the prosodic structures which govern them, and suggest that speech timing patterns are used to aid utterance recognition. In the spirit of optimal control theory, we propose that recognition requirements are balanced against requirements such as rate of speech and style, as well as movement costs, to yield (near-)optimal planned surface timing patterns; additional factors may influence the implementation of that plan. In the second part of the paper, we discuss theories of timing control in models of speech production and motor control. We present three types of evidence that support models of speech production that involve extrinsic timing. These include (i) increasing variability with increases in interval duration, (ii) evidence that speakers refer to and plan surface durations, and (iii) independent timing of movement onsets and offsets.

show abstract

“…(2) can be rewritten to solve for Var(N) as (6) All the terms in eq. (6) are constant except for Var(N) and E(I).…”

Section: An Alarm Clock Model·mentioning

confidence: 99%