2006
DOI: 10.1680/gein.2006.13.6.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D and 3D numerical modelling of flow through composite liners involving partially saturated GCLs

Abstract: A numerical study was performed in order to investigate the influence on the flow rate of the presence of defects in the geomembrane of a composite liner involving GCLs. In the approach presented in this paper, porous media in the composite liner, i.e. the interface, the GCL and the underlying soil liner, which is a CCL, are partially saturated in the numerical modelling performed. The first aim of the paper is to evaluate the impact of this partial saturation on the flow rates and the lateral extension of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous works performed by Foose et al (2001), Cartaud et al (2005a) and Saidi et al (2006). The interface was represented by quadrilateral elements that shared nodes with the upper layer of elements of the GCL mesh.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Numerical Code Mesh And Boundary Conditsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with previous works performed by Foose et al (2001), Cartaud et al (2005a) and Saidi et al (2006). The interface was represented by quadrilateral elements that shared nodes with the upper layer of elements of the GCL mesh.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Numerical Code Mesh And Boundary Conditsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For the sake of consistency with previous papers dealing with experimental (Barroso et al, 2006a, b) and numerical investigation of flow rates through partially saturated composite liners incorporating a GCL (Saidi et al, 2006), the following ranges of parameters were adopted: square defects width varying from 3 Â 10 À3 to 3 Â 10 À2 m; hydraulic heads ranging from 0.3 to 3 m; A CCL thickness equal to 1 m; A GCL thickness equal to 9 Â 10 À3 m which is consistent with the saturated hydraulic conductivity presented in the following section.…”
Section: Geometric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations