Although lead‐based perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are highly efficient, the toxicity of lead (Pb) limits its large‐scale commercialization. As such, there is an urgent need to find alternatives. Many studies have examined tin‐based PSCs. However, pure tin‐based perovskites are easily oxidized in the air or just in glovebox with an ultrasmall amount of oxygen. Such a characteristic makes their performance and stability less ideal compared with those of lead‐based perovskites. Herein, how to address the instability of tin‐based perovskites is introduced in detail. First, the crystalline structure, optical properties, and sources of instability of tin‐based perovskites are summarized. Next, the preparation methods of tin‐based perovskite are discussed. Then, various measures for solving the instability problem are explained using four strategies: additive engineering, deoxidizer, partial substitution, and reduced dimensions. Finally, the challenges and prospects are laid out to help researchers develop highly efficient and stable tin‐based perovskites in the future.