2010
DOI: 10.3182/20100607-3-cz-4010.00061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2DOF PI and PID Controllers Tuning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimal controller parameters may be derived analytically by generalization of the approach applied in [27,28]. For the DIPDT model, it starts with a derivation of the closed loop transfer functions of 1DOF PID control, where…”
Section: Dof Pid Controller For the Dipdt Plant By The Qrdp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optimal controller parameters may be derived analytically by generalization of the approach applied in [27,28]. For the DIPDT model, it starts with a derivation of the closed loop transfer functions of 1DOF PID control, where…”
Section: Dof Pid Controller For the Dipdt Plant By The Qrdp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiple real dominant pole (MRDP) method represents one of the first analytical methods used for controller tuning [23]. In numerous later applications to the design of simple controllers, we could also mention P and PD controller design for time delayed integral systems in [18], or the design of PI and PID controllers in [27,28]. Whilst the above method directly gives both the dominant closed loop poles and the corresponding "optimal" controller parameters, in pole assignment control the choice of closed loop poles represents a crucial part of the controller tuning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and by a filter Q n (equation 15) has been proposed in Huba. 55 It is based on a tuning derived for an unfiltered time delayed loop to guarantee a triple real dominant pole (TRDP) s o of the characteristic quasi-polynomial P(s) 56 satisfying P(s o ) = 0, _ P(s o ) = 0 and € P(s o ) = 0, when the corresponding optimal PI controller parameters K co and T io are…”
Section: -Dof Fpi Controller Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, in Reference [56], a derivation of higher-order PID controllers by generalising the Skogestad Internal Model Control (SIMC) method [8] for analytical model-based controller tuning was proposed. In Reference [59], robust and simple analytical 2-DOF PI/PID controller tuning rules based on the multiple dominant pole method (MDPM) were proposed. The method enables calculation of controller parameters while maintaining non-oscillatory closed-loop responses without overshoots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%