2nd Global Enterprise Blockchain Benchmarking Study

Rauchs, Michel; Blandin, Apolline; Bear, Keith; McKeon, Stephen B.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3461765

Cited by 38 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As the sector has become more established, researchers affiliated with the University of Cambridge produced their second Global Enterprise Blockchain Benchmarking Study (Rauchs, Blandin, Bear, and McKeon, 2019). Using survey data from over 200 startups, established companies, central banks, and public sector institutions, the authors provide key insights into the state of the blockchain ecosystem.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities*

Pimentel

Boulianne

2020

Accounting Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article provides a review of the accounting blockchain literature, with a focus on current trends and recommendations for future research opportunities. Our review identifies seven main areas: (i) future of blockchain technology, (ii) impact on the accounting function, (iii) auditing considerations, (iv) financial reporting for cryptoassets, (v) case studies, (vi) governance, and (vii) taxation. The article aims to bridge the gap between practitioners and academics by providing a review of both areas of literature and highlighting common ground between the two arenas. While academics have begun to explore how the accounting profession might change in response to blockchain, this research is limited primarily to the auditing field. Practitioners, for their part, have expanded their scope to also devote significant attention to the financial reporting and taxation of cryptoassets. Expanding the discussion of accounting and blockchains beyond their current concentrations in auditing and accounting information systems, we call for more research on the impact of blockchain technology in other areas such as corporate governance or the intersection of accounting and society.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities*

Pimentel

Boulianne

2020

Accounting Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Groups of FinTech innovations are referred to as ecosystems in their own right, e.g. blockchain (Rauchs et al, 2019); and RegTech (regulatory technology) (CCAF and EY, 2019).…”

Section: Theoretical Approaches To Fintechmentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial Geography I: Exploring FinTech – Maps and concepts

Wójcik

2020

Progress in Human Geography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the first of two reports on FinTech, I review definitions, roots and taxonomies of FinTech, survey studies charting FinTech development, and theoretical approaches to FinTech. Emerging empirical research shows a dynamic growth of FinTech characterized by heterogeneity and diversity. Ecosystems, financial ecologies, and digital platform economies are the most popular approaches to FinTech, and I argue that they can be used fruitfully in combination with more established concepts, such as networks and agglomeration. Overall, I show that FinTech research is in a state of flux concerning concepts and empirics, and highlight the potential of geography to tame the beast.

show abstract

“…The hash and the range of verifiers [1,4] are used in calling requestExternalEMR from HSC A . The network processes the request to validate the doctor parameters, resulting in constructing the desired range of verifiers [2,4] because the minimum number of acceptable verifiers by the network is 2. Upon successful processing of the request, the network returns the request identifier to the doctor as a broadcasted event.…”

Section: A Qualitative Functionality Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application-Level Interoperability for Blockchain Networks

Madine¹,

Salah²,

Jayaraman³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decentralized digital manufacturing can contribute in advancing automation to overcome the limitations posed by most of today's manufacturing systems due to the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, certain challenges, such as attestation and certification of the product, tracing the product throughout the entire process, and ensuring the protection of intellectual property (IP) rights, are hindering its widespread adoption. In this paper, we propose a blockchain-based solution for decentralized digital manufacturing of medical devices and supplies during the Covid-19 pandemic. We develop Ethereum smart contracts to govern and track the different participants' transactions throughout the process in a manner that is decentralized, transparent, traceable and trackable, auditable, trustworthy, and secure. We incorporate the decentralized storage of the InterPlanetary file system (IPFS) into the Ethereum blockchain to store and fetch manufacturing records, Internet of things (IoT)-based devices records, and additional product and digital manufacturing process details. We present the system architecture and algorithms along with their full implementation details. Furthermore, we present cost and security analyses to show that the proposed solution is cost-efficient and resilient against well-known vulnerabilities and security attacks. We make our smart contracts code publicly available on GitHub.

show abstract

2nd Global Enterprise Blockchain Benchmarking Study

Cited by 38 publications

References 0 publications

Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities*

Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities*

Financial Geography I: Exploring FinTech – Maps and concepts

Application-Level Interoperability for Blockchain Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About