2012
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/29/24/245005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3+1 geodesic equation and images in numerical spacetimes

Abstract: Abstract. The equations governing null and timelike geodesics are derived within the 3+1 formalism of general relativity. In addition to the particle's position, they encompass an evolution equation for the particle's energy leading to a 3+1 expression of the redshift factor for photons. An important application is the computation of images and spectra in spacetimes arising from numerical relativity, via the ray-tracing technique. This is illustrated here by images of numerically computed stationary neutron st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although numerical integration of the interior perturbation equations is fast, we are ultimately interested in calculating properties of a radiation field incident on a telescope so as to evaluate a likelihood function (Section 2.2.1). A matched stable analytic exterior solution permits faster geodesic computation than do numerical exterior solutions because computation of the affine connection requires numerical post-processing of metric data (as in, e.g., Vincent et al 2011Vincent et al , 2012. Moreover, an approximate slow-rotation symmetry can be exploited (see Nättilä & Pihajoki 2017, and references therein), which is useful because (CPU-bound) null geodesic computation is expensive for non-Kerr spacetimes due to the coupled system of ordinary non-linear second-order differential geodesic equations (see, e.g., Dexter & Agol 2009;Chan et al 2013).…”
Section: Exterior Spacetime Solutions For Modelling Observed Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerical integration of the interior perturbation equations is fast, we are ultimately interested in calculating properties of a radiation field incident on a telescope so as to evaluate a likelihood function (Section 2.2.1). A matched stable analytic exterior solution permits faster geodesic computation than do numerical exterior solutions because computation of the affine connection requires numerical post-processing of metric data (as in, e.g., Vincent et al 2011Vincent et al , 2012. Moreover, an approximate slow-rotation symmetry can be exploited (see Nättilä & Pihajoki 2017, and references therein), which is useful because (CPU-bound) null geodesic computation is expensive for non-Kerr spacetimes due to the coupled system of ordinary non-linear second-order differential geodesic equations (see, e.g., Dexter & Agol 2009;Chan et al 2013).…”
Section: Exterior Spacetime Solutions For Modelling Observed Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, numerical relativistic simulations are currently becoming one of the most important tools of theoretical cosmology [1, 2, 7-9, 27, 46, 47, 50, 74, 75]. While the null geodesic tracking is a fairly standard problem in numerical relativity [10,69], extracting the position drift effects is not. It is, of course, possible to do it using ray tracing together with the shooting method: we begin with one null geodesic connecting the source and the observer and then search by trial and error for another one, connecting observer's and emitter's worldline at a slightly later moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open-source ray tracing code Gyoto (see Vincent et al 2011Vincent et al , 2012, and http://gyoto.obspm.fr) is used to compute null geodesics backwards in time, from a distant observer towards the neutron star. Photons are traced in the neutron star's metric as computed by the Lorene/nrotstar code.…”
Section: Ray Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%