2021
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3051930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D Crosswell Electromagnetic Inversion Based on General Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is still a great platform named MARE2DEM for high-precision forward modelling and inversion, which could be applied to multiple geophysical scenes with 2.5D interpretation [47]. Since the main contribution of this study is the extension of existing theories for long-distance crosswell application without the innovation of the interpretation method, we adopt the classical Gauss-Newton method [48] to perform the inversion. It is known that the Gauss-Newton method is a traditional nonlinear iterative method that can perform well in image interpretation in the field of geophysics.…”
Section: Fig 10 Comparison Between Measured Data and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there is still a great platform named MARE2DEM for high-precision forward modelling and inversion, which could be applied to multiple geophysical scenes with 2.5D interpretation [47]. Since the main contribution of this study is the extension of existing theories for long-distance crosswell application without the innovation of the interpretation method, we adopt the classical Gauss-Newton method [48] to perform the inversion. It is known that the Gauss-Newton method is a traditional nonlinear iterative method that can perform well in image interpretation in the field of geophysics.…”
Section: Fig 10 Comparison Between Measured Data and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be clarified that the modeling and inversion are currently performed based on traditional algorithms, but the interpretation results can still provide a reliable basis for the feasibility of the proposed method. In the future, we will adopt advanced platform [46] and optimization algorithms [48]- [50] to realize more valuable data interpretation, and the study of high-precision inversion will be presented as our subsequent work.…”
Section: Fig 10 Comparison Between Measured Data and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the 3D RTM method has been applied in the field with promising cross-hole results [32][33][34]. Compared with traditional ray-based cross-well methods, RTM includes more wavefield information, allowing seismic wave energy to be returned to its true location in space, obtaining more accurate geological structures and providing higher-quality images [35,36]. In terms of cross-hole seismic RTM, researchers have proposed 2D cross-hole seismic transverse RTM imaging of acoustic waves and elastic waves in isotropic media [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%