2018
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2018.2851206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D Drone-Base-Station Placement With In-Band Full-Duplex Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors assumed that UAVs and ground BSs coexist and then maximized user satisfaction with provided data rates by finding the optimal position of UAVs and associating users to ground BS or UAVs. Authors in [20], [21], [22] employed HD transmission in UAVs, while authors in [23] investigated the problem of 3-D drone BS placement with FD communication in the heterogeneous networks. The authors employed FD drones in coexistence with ground BS to improve network throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors assumed that UAVs and ground BSs coexist and then maximized user satisfaction with provided data rates by finding the optimal position of UAVs and associating users to ground BS or UAVs. Authors in [20], [21], [22] employed HD transmission in UAVs, while authors in [23] investigated the problem of 3-D drone BS placement with FD communication in the heterogeneous networks. The authors employed FD drones in coexistence with ground BS to improve network throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in this setting, FD technology is used in multismall cell networks, DL and UL transmission coexist, and we have to consider SI and inter-cell interference. Moreover, unlike [23] which considers different frequency spectrum for each BS, we consider frequency reuse in cells in order to increase the network capacity and data rate, hence, we have to consider intra-cell interference. Here, we investigate three different scenarios; at first, we aim to maximize DL sum-rate whilst prescribing a certain minimum requirement for the UL transmission rate by optimizing FD-UAV transmission power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the in-band STR in a multiuser environment causes co-channel interference (CCI) between communicating users [5], or between a backhaul link and an access link [6]. In a multiuser environment, the in-band STR of an IFD is generally known to degrade network performance, despite the benefit of doubling the spectral efficiency of a transmission link.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multiuser environment, the in-band STR of an IFD is generally known to degrade network performance, despite the benefit of doubling the spectral efficiency of a transmission link. This is because the in-band STR in a multiuser environment causes co-channel interference (CCI) between communicating users [5], or between a backhaul link and an access link [6]. However, from a PHYSEC perspective, the CCI yielded by the in-band STR of IFD can be used to protect the information of legitimate users from eavesdropping [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above works show that wireless backhaul has a great impact on the communication performance of UAV-BSs, and careful design is needed to guarantee the reliability of the wireless backhaul and improve performance. As compared to the out-band backhaul, the in-band backhaul can adjust the allocation of spectrum between the backhaul link and the access link to achieve a balance between them according to the dynamics of their channel quality and thus may have a higher spectrum efficiency and is more suitable for the scenario where the spectrum resource is limited [33][34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%