2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D magnetotelluric imaging of the Phayao Fault Zone, Northern Thailand: Evidence for saline fluid in the source region of the 2014 Chiang Rai earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
Fig. 15Illustrating the fault F3 interpretation from gravity data corresponds well with previous studies of Magnetotellurics (MT) map from Boonchaisuk et al. (2017) that interpreted the faults on the eastern and northern parts of the Mae Suai Basin.
…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
Fig. 15Illustrating the fault F3 interpretation from gravity data corresponds well with previous studies of Magnetotellurics (MT) map from Boonchaisuk et al. (2017) that interpreted the faults on the eastern and northern parts of the Mae Suai Basin.
…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…(2017) (Fig. 2b) and the larger scale high conductive fault zone of the Magnetotellurics inversion solution by Boonchaisuk et al. (2017) are also compatible with the ENE-WSE orientation of Fault F3 (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…On 5 May 2014, the Mw 6.2 Mae Lao earthquake occurred in this region of mapped faults, within an area inferred to have high fluid content (Boonchaisuk et al, 2017). The event produced a maximum PGA of 0.30 g measured on top of a dam 15 km from the epicenter and 0.13 g at a ground-based station 27 km from the epicenter (Ornthammarath and Warnitchai, 2015), consistent with the previously estimated hazard probabilities.…”
Section: Mae Lao Earthquakesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The Magnetotelluric (MT) method was chosen in this case, considering that this method is capable of reaching depths of tens of kilometers [5] and still displays the boundaries between different resistivity features clearly. This method can also detect various underground features that appear as resistivity anomalies, including faults [6], alteration zones [7], karst channels [8], and saline fluids [9]. The MT method has been used in various studies of detailed underground structures, especially in cases reaching depths of thousands of meters or more, such as basin investigations [10][11][12], aquifers [13], geothermal systems [14], volcanic systems [15], even cratons [5] [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%