Variation – Normen – Identitäten 2018
DOI: 10.1515/9783110538625-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der quantitativen Spracheinstellungsforschung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the Bavarian dialect of Germany holds a significant and independent position within the conceptual framework of languages ( Adler, 2019 ). A survey revealed that the Bavarian dialect is considered the second most appealing German dialect (29,6%), after the Northern German dialect (34,9%), while only about 7% found the Berlin dialect attractive ( Gärtig et al, 2010 ; Adler and Plewnia, 2018 ). At the same time, a mere 5% of respondents found the Berlin dialect unappealing, whereas having no dialect at all was rated as unattractive by 32,6% of the participants ( Gärtig et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the Bavarian dialect of Germany holds a significant and independent position within the conceptual framework of languages ( Adler, 2019 ). A survey revealed that the Bavarian dialect is considered the second most appealing German dialect (29,6%), after the Northern German dialect (34,9%), while only about 7% found the Berlin dialect attractive ( Gärtig et al, 2010 ; Adler and Plewnia, 2018 ). At the same time, a mere 5% of respondents found the Berlin dialect unappealing, whereas having no dialect at all was rated as unattractive by 32,6% of the participants ( Gärtig et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ansätzen ähneln einige der Zuschreibungen der Vorgehensweise der Attitudes-towards-Languages-Skala (AToL), genauer gesagt den damit gemessenen Dimensionen value, welche u. a. affektiv-ästhetische Bewertungen einschließt, und structure, bei der die Wahrnehmung strukturlinguistischer Eigenschaften gemessen wird (Schoel et al 2013, Plewnia/Adler 2018. Im Unterschied zu den AToL-Instrumenten wurden hier keine skalaren Einordnungen vorgegebener Attribute für beide Sprachen abgefragt, sondern lediglich ein absoluter Vergleich zwischen den beiden beteiligten Fragen, um den Umfang und Aufwand für die Befragten in einem vertretbaren Rahmen zu halten.…”
Section: Spanisch Und Französisch Im Vergleichunclassified