2017
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-1993(17)30697-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

360 Quality of life of parents with children affected by cystic fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 17 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 30 , 37 39 Of these, one used the Ulm Quality of Life Inventory for parents of chronically ill children, 37 which consists of questions on five dimensions of QoL, scored on a 5-point scale with high scores indicating a better QoL. 37 One used the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Assessment–Abbreviated, 40 which consists of 26 questions, and is scored from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best QoL. Three used the EQ-5D-5 L 17 , 24 , 30 and one the EQ-5D-3 L, 25 both of which generate a utility score from the participants’ scoring of five dimensions of health on a scale anchored at 0 (representing a state as bad as being dead) and 1 (representing full health), and a visual analog scale (VAS) score against which participants rate their health from 0 to 100, with 100 signifying the best imaginable health.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 30 , 37 39 Of these, one used the Ulm Quality of Life Inventory for parents of chronically ill children, 37 which consists of questions on five dimensions of QoL, scored on a 5-point scale with high scores indicating a better QoL. 37 One used the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Assessment–Abbreviated, 40 which consists of 26 questions, and is scored from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best QoL. Three used the EQ-5D-5 L 17 , 24 , 30 and one the EQ-5D-3 L, 25 both of which generate a utility score from the participants’ scoring of five dimensions of health on a scale anchored at 0 (representing a state as bad as being dead) and 1 (representing full health), and a visual analog scale (VAS) score against which participants rate their health from 0 to 100, with 100 signifying the best imaginable health.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%