Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP) 2022
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

363. JWAS version 2: leveraging biological information and highthroughput phenotypes into genomic prediction and association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a previous study (Fan et al, 2011 ), a posterior inclusion probability threshold of 0.10 was used for manually measured phenotypes, and 0.50 was used as a more conservative threshold for hyperspectral GWA. All Bayesian analyses were fit using 60,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo samples, 6000 burn‐ins, and a thinning rate of 60 implemented in JWAS (Cheng et al, 2018 ). Model convergence was assessed using trace plots of the posterior means of the parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a previous study (Fan et al, 2011 ), a posterior inclusion probability threshold of 0.10 was used for manually measured phenotypes, and 0.50 was used as a more conservative threshold for hyperspectral GWA. All Bayesian analyses were fit using 60,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo samples, 6000 burn‐ins, and a thinning rate of 60 implemented in JWAS (Cheng et al, 2018 ). Model convergence was assessed using trace plots of the posterior means of the parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When fitting models to these simulated data, we included the intercept for each trait as the only fixed effect. We compared to a single-trait implementation of BayesC ( ) using the package ( Cheng, Fernando, et al 2018 ). The model specification of was similar to that used in the Genomic Prediction application, except: (1) no fixed factor loadings were included in , (2) the number of factors fitted in the model was 10 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After creating the simulated data, we applied 3 methods to identify QTL and estimate their effects on the focal trait: (1) single-trait Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) using GCTA ( Yang et al 2011 ) (ST-GCTA); (2) single-trait BayesC implemented in JWAS ( Cheng, Fernando, et al 2018 ) ( ); and (3) implemented in .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where G is a 2 x 2 covariance matrix for the effects of SNPs for parities k and l, following Cheng et al (2018); and e ij is the residual effect, with e ik e il ~MVN 0, R ( ), where R is a 2 x 2 covariance matrix of residual effects for a sow's POP phenotypes for parities k and l.…”
Section: Estimation Of Genetic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%