2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As GO fillers impart good mechanical performance and osteoconductivity, they have attracted considerable attention for their application as nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering [ 25 , 26 ]. Angiogenesis precedes osteogenesis, and a large number of osteoprogenitors are recruited and distributed around H-type blood vessels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As GO fillers impart good mechanical performance and osteoconductivity, they have attracted considerable attention for their application as nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering [ 25 , 26 ]. Angiogenesis precedes osteogenesis, and a large number of osteoprogenitors are recruited and distributed around H-type blood vessels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioactive inks containing 0.5 mg/mL graphene oxide illustrated the highest ALP activity, calcium deposition, as well as expression of multiple osteogenic markers in addition to acceptable printability and shape fidelity. A group of researchers investigated the effect of different concentrations of graphene oxide to alginate-gelatin bioactive ink on osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs as well as printability and shape fidelity [ 85 ]. The cell-laden scaffolds with 1 mg/mL graphene oxide concentration in bioreactor illustrated better gene expression and ECM mineralization after 42 days than alginate-gelatin scaffolds ( Figure 5 B).…”
Section: Bioactive Inksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to that of CTR (blank control) and TCP groups, Micro-CT analysis of defect space exhibited a distinctly greater level of bone regeneration in SPS group (reproduced content is open access) [ 82 ]. ( B ) Light microscopy images of 3D bioprinted cell-laden GO scaffolds cultured in osteogenic media for 1, 7, and 42 days (reproduced content is open access) [ 85 ].…”
Section: Bioactive Inksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A human MSC-laden GO/ALG/GLT composite bioink was prepared to form 3D bone-mimicking scaffolds using a 3D bioprinting technique. The GO composite bioinks containing higher GO concentrations (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL) improved the bioprintability, scaffold fidelity, compressive modulus, cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and extracellular matrix mineralization compared to the pure ALG/GLT system, while the bioink with GO concentration 1 mg/mL was the optimal filler [156]. A scaffold composed of mesoporous bioactive glasses and GO was investigated for local angiogenesis and bone healing.…”
Section: Graphene-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%