2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2009.5414317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D display dependent quality evaluation and rate allocation using scalable video coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For perceived quality measure of stereo videos, although PSNR is a quality metric that is frequently used and widely adopted for conventional 2D video, simple averaging of the two PSNR values from two views without considering the characteristics of HVS can cause misleading results. In [17], Saygili et al proposed an effective quality metric based on the conclusion from subjective test that when PSNR of both views are close to each other, the higher PSNR reflects the perceived visual quality better. The metric is shown below,…”
Section: B Adaptive Inter-view Rate Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For perceived quality measure of stereo videos, although PSNR is a quality metric that is frequently used and widely adopted for conventional 2D video, simple averaging of the two PSNR values from two views without considering the characteristics of HVS can cause misleading results. In [17], Saygili et al proposed an effective quality metric based on the conclusion from subjective test that when PSNR of both views are close to each other, the higher PSNR reflects the perceived visual quality better. The metric is shown below,…”
Section: B Adaptive Inter-view Rate Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…α is a threshold to evaluate whether the PNSR from two views are close to each other, and it was proposed to be 0.85 in [17]. β is a weighting parameter that depends on the display technology and spatial resolution of the degraded view.…”
Section: B Adaptive Inter-view Rate Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory can be exploited in stereo video encoding to reach the best stereo rate-visual distortion (RD) performance. This is performed by asymmetric coding, which is the reduction of the spatial and/or quantization resolution of the auxiliary view, while the reference view is kept in full or higher resolution [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The objective of asymmetric coding is to maximize the perceived 3D video quality subject to an overall bitrate constraint by efficient stereo rate scaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], asymmetric rate scaling using scalable video coding was evaluated on 2 different types of 3D display technologies: polarized projection and parallax barrier. The experimental results showed that users with full spatial resolution 3D displays, like polarized projection, should prefer SNR scalability, while users with half-resolution 3D displays, such as parallax barrier, should favor the spatially scaled stream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13] the 3D sensation, visualization conditions and the search of sweet spot are treated comparing 2D and 3D configurations. In [27] the video coding is treated for measuring the quality established by the users. In [32] the visualization of landscape architecture in auto-stereoscopic devices is studied, comparing 2D and 3D images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%