2006
DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D downscaling model for radar-based precipitation fields

Abstract: The generating of rainfall fields with a higher resolution than so far observed and with realistic features is a challenge with multiple applications. In particular it could be useful to quantify the uncertainty introduced by the different sources of error affecting radar measurements, in a controlled simulation framework. This paper proposes a method to generate three-dimensional high-resolution rainfall fields based on downscaling meteorological radar data. The technique performs a scale analysis of the firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
8

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Their difference lies in the systems and models used to simulate water levels and inundation zones. Data‐driven systems rely on historical flood databases and use statistical and stochastic models (Llort et al, 2014; Yang et al, 2015) and, more recently, machine learning techniques (Garcia et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2020), to predict water levels. The second family of systems uses hydrological (Bouvier et al, 2018; Javelle et al, 2016) or hydraulic models (Chitwatkulsiri et al, 2021; Hofmann & Schüttrumpf, 2019) for water level, discharge, or inundation plane prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their difference lies in the systems and models used to simulate water levels and inundation zones. Data‐driven systems rely on historical flood databases and use statistical and stochastic models (Llort et al, 2014; Yang et al, 2015) and, more recently, machine learning techniques (Garcia et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2020), to predict water levels. The second family of systems uses hydrological (Bouvier et al, 2018; Javelle et al, 2016) or hydraulic models (Chitwatkulsiri et al, 2021; Hofmann & Schüttrumpf, 2019) for water level, discharge, or inundation plane prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wavelet transform gives a representation of the signal as a function of both frequency and time, and allows us to study the local variability of fields at different scales (see, e.g., Foufoula-Georgiou and Kumar 1995). The second downscaling approach is based on the fact that the standard deviation of rainfall fluctuations standardized by the scaling component (defined via the wavelet transform) seem to obey a simple scaling law over the different available scales (Harris and Foufoula-Georgiou 2001;Llort et al 2006;Perica and Foufoula-Georgiou 1996a;Venugopal et al 1999). Extrapolating this law permits to simulate rainfall fluctuations over the non-observed smaller scales.…”
Section: Wavelet-based Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, rainfall signals are decomposed using the wavelet transform (Mallat 1989) with the Haar base (Haar 1910). The sample distributions of the fluctuation components standardized by the scaling component are assumed to be Gaussian with zero mean (Llort et al 2006;Perica and Foufoula-Georgiou 1996a). Moreover, standard deviations of those signals follow a simple scaling law.…”
Section: Wavelet-based Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations