2015
DOI: 10.1364/oe.23.002375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D mapping of intensity field about the focus of a micrometer–scale parabolic mirror

Abstract: Abstract:We report on the fabrication and diffraction-limited characterization of parabolic focusing micromirrors. Sub-micron beam waists are measured for mirrors with 10-µm radius aperture and measured fixed focal lengths in the range from 24 µm to 36 µm. Optical characterization of the 3D intensity in the near-field produced when the device is illuminated with collimated light is performed using a modified confocal microscope. Results are compared directly with angular spectrum simulations, yielding strong a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, we introduced the two optical lenses which had different radii of curvatures (45.61 and 123.17 mm, Table 1). The randomly distributed nanostructures were uniformly formed on these Figure 4c, the position of maximum peak intensity of SF11 DARCs lens is not changed, compared to the SF11 bare lens (vertical dashed line), which indicates the identical focal length [28]. In addition, the enhancement ratio was calculated by the DARCs peak intensity divided by the bare peak intensity, which displayed how the transmission at the center was more efficiently enhanced, up to 30%.…”
Section: Imaging Properties Of Fabricated Single Lensmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In our experiment, we introduced the two optical lenses which had different radii of curvatures (45.61 and 123.17 mm, Table 1). The randomly distributed nanostructures were uniformly formed on these Figure 4c, the position of maximum peak intensity of SF11 DARCs lens is not changed, compared to the SF11 bare lens (vertical dashed line), which indicates the identical focal length [28]. In addition, the enhancement ratio was calculated by the DARCs peak intensity divided by the bare peak intensity, which displayed how the transmission at the center was more efficiently enhanced, up to 30%.…”
Section: Imaging Properties Of Fabricated Single Lensmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This uses the angular spectrum of the field, ( 0 ( )  ), and the Helmholtz propagator, , such that 30]. We use this method, following the details in [29], and references therein, to complete the design algorithm shown in figure 3; firstly, a target intensity is calculated and then propagated backwards, using equation (2), by the focal length. The phase of the resulting electric field in this plane is rounded to the desired bit depth, as discussed later in the text.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…y for an electric field with wave vector k = 2π/λ [29,30]. We use this method, following the details in [29], and references therein, to complete the design algorithm shown in figure 3; firstly, a c) a)…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of imaging light interacting with periodic BEC fringes can be modelled by Fourier-propagating the light waves, based on the initial conditions of the field immediately after the condensate, then performing the inverse Fourier transform to convert back to real space [48][49][50][51]. Propagation effects inside the BEC are neglected as the condensate size in the beam propagation direction is considerably smaller than the Talbot period.…”
Section: Talbot Effect: Theory and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%