2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.752613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D mask modeling with oblique incidence and mask corner rounding effects for the 32nm node

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that there is an appreciable change in F θ value at angles of incidence and observation larger than ± 10 o from normal incidence. To describe the image field variation with angle of incidence, Debye's integral [10] has to be evaluated using the diffracted far field, described by equation (7). In order to find analytical solution for Debye's integral, the function F θ has to be simplified.…”
Section: Evaluating Diffracted Image Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that there is an appreciable change in F θ value at angles of incidence and observation larger than ± 10 o from normal incidence. To describe the image field variation with angle of incidence, Debye's integral [10] has to be evaluated using the diffracted far field, described by equation (7). In order to find analytical solution for Debye's integral, the function F θ has to be simplified.…”
Section: Evaluating Diffracted Image Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As NA increases to unity and beyond, the validity of this approximation is becoming questionable. It was shown in previous work that the validity of CSC breaks down as NA increases [6,7]. Hence, it is crucial to account for oblique incidence, when modeling diffraction, to keep model accuracy within accepted limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three-dimensional (3D) simulation is necessary for accurate modeling in such critical problems, e.g., 3D defects, 3D mask repair and optical proximity effects. However, the major disadvantage of 3D rigorous vector simulation is the huge increased computation time and memory requirements over 3D scalar models and 2D vector models [4,5]. Based on this, and taking the OPC model into account, computation load is much heavier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%