2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-8166(01)00037-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D micro-inspection goes DMD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The white light confocal microscope was then proposed to measure one area profile at a time in conjunction with digital image processing technique. However, in order to detect the whole surface profile one more scanning principle has to be added, such as the point scan by rotating a Nipkow disk (Jordany, 1998) or the structure light projection method with DMD (Bitte, 2001). A low cost confocal microscope probe for area detection has been developed .…”
Section: Confocal Microscopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The white light confocal microscope was then proposed to measure one area profile at a time in conjunction with digital image processing technique. However, in order to detect the whole surface profile one more scanning principle has to be added, such as the point scan by rotating a Nipkow disk (Jordany, 1998) or the structure light projection method with DMD (Bitte, 2001). A low cost confocal microscope probe for area detection has been developed .…”
Section: Confocal Microscopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spinning Nipkow disc is frequently used there in order to do the time-multiplexing for the pin-holes that cover the field of view during a camera frame. Recent work has been reported that introduces the digital micromirror device as a well suited and flexible alternative for the Nipkow disk 15,16,17 . The spinning aperture disk can be replaced by a dynamic pattern of sub-apertures that change rapidly.…”
Section: Confocal Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confocal microscopy (CM) in its different implementations [11][12][13][14][15] can be much faster than WLI in terms of depth scan, because there is no scanning of a high-frequency carrier signal necessary. So CM might be a candidate for high speed measurement, however, CM displays a few drawbacks discussed below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%