2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D micro-structuring by CW direct laser writing on PbO-Bi2O3-Ga2O3 glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas, larger micro-dots diameter of 320.245 µm and deeper micro-dots height of 92.973 µm were obtained when the laser power was 8 W. This is because as the laser power is increased, the intensity of laser beam also increases, which leads to an increase in temperature and reduce the viscosity of the surface of the polymer [45]. This causes the material to vaporize and be ejected from the surface, creating a large and deep formation of micro-dots [46]. This shows that the desired size; diameter and height of the micro-dots can be controlled using different range of laser powers.…”
Section: Effect Of Laser Power To the Formation Of Micro-dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%

Fabrication of Polymer Light Guide Plate (LGP) using Direct CO2 Laser Structuring

Norfazilasari Yasman,
Raja Murfiqah Raja Mohamad Fouzy,
Mohd Zairulnizam Mohd Zawawi
2024
ARAM
“…Whereas, larger micro-dots diameter of 320.245 µm and deeper micro-dots height of 92.973 µm were obtained when the laser power was 8 W. This is because as the laser power is increased, the intensity of laser beam also increases, which leads to an increase in temperature and reduce the viscosity of the surface of the polymer [45]. This causes the material to vaporize and be ejected from the surface, creating a large and deep formation of micro-dots [46]. This shows that the desired size; diameter and height of the micro-dots can be controlled using different range of laser powers.…”
Section: Effect Of Laser Power To the Formation Of Micro-dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%

Fabrication of Polymer Light Guide Plate (LGP) using Direct CO2 Laser Structuring

Norfazilasari Yasman,
Raja Murfiqah Raja Mohamad Fouzy,
Mohd Zairulnizam Mohd Zawawi
2024
ARAM
“…The film sample with a mixture of MgO and ZnO showed a different behavior of partially agglomerated spherical particles (probably ZnO) in the middle of the so-called snowflake with a lamellar character of the tails (MgO lamellae), see Figure 4 h. The surface of the sample with La 2 O 3 nanoparticles was rough compared to the other samples and therefore the particles are not clearly visible (see Figure 4i) but using mechanical behavior in the log module showed that La 2 O 3 nanoparticles were welldispersed particles with an average size of 100 nm (see arrows in Figure 4j). Further, AFM images in three-dimensional (3D) form and root mean square (RMS) parameters (see Figure S6 and Table S3, respectively) were used for sample roughness evaluation [108,109]. showed a different behavior of partially agglomerated spherical particles (probably ZnO) in the middle of the so-called snowflake with a lamellar character of the tails (MgO lamellae), see Figure 4 h. The surface of the sample with La2O3 nanoparticles was rough compared to the other samples and therefore the particles are not clearly visible (see Figure 4i) but using mechanical behavior in the log module showed that La2O3 nanoparticles were well-dispersed particles with an average size of 100 nm (see arrows in Figure 4j).…”
Section: Embedded Nanoparticles: Characterization Real Content and Lo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…showed a different behavior of partially agglomerated spherical particles (probably ZnO) in the middle of the so-called snowflake with a lamellar character of the tails (MgO lamellae), see Figure 4 h. The surface of the sample with La2O3 nanoparticles was rough compared to the other samples and therefore the particles are not clearly visible (see Figure 4i) but using mechanical behavior in the log module showed that La2O3 nanoparticles were well-dispersed particles with an average size of 100 nm (see arrows in Figure 4j). Further, AFM images in three-dimensional (3D) form and root mean square (RMS) parameters (see Figure S6 and Table S3, respectively) were used for sample roughness evaluation [108,109]. The morphology and distribution of MeO nanoparticles inside the dried latex films were investigated by SEM.…”
Section: Embedded Nanoparticles: Characterization Real Content and Lo...mentioning
confidence: 99%