2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D printing for polymer/particle-based processing: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 226 publications
2
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, so far the resolution (the smallest feature size controllable) has been on the order of hundreds of micrometers, although the integration of nanostructures into 3D-printed materials or patterns is possible. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In other words, 3D printing is several orders of magnitude away from the feature sizes accessible by lithographic methods. In summary, 3D printing has the direct pattern generation capability and materials versatility, whereas Additive manufacturing (3D printing) has not been applicable to micro-and nanoscale engineering due to the limited resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, so far the resolution (the smallest feature size controllable) has been on the order of hundreds of micrometers, although the integration of nanostructures into 3D-printed materials or patterns is possible. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In other words, 3D printing is several orders of magnitude away from the feature sizes accessible by lithographic methods. In summary, 3D printing has the direct pattern generation capability and materials versatility, whereas Additive manufacturing (3D printing) has not been applicable to micro-and nanoscale engineering due to the limited resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 After the growth, the Si NWs were thermally oxidized in a convection oven (controlled O 2 atmosphere) at 980 °C for 8 h to form SiO 2 NWs. 22 , 30 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their intricate spinneret design was through Polyjet 3D printing that conventional tooling engineering finds time‐consuming and expensive 14 . Other additive manufacturing methods of selective laser sintering, stereolithography and fused deposition modeling (FDM) have all contributed to the user customization of spinneret design for unique fiber microstructures and applications 15–18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%