2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Scaffolds Based on Conductive Polymers for Biomedical Applications

Abstract: applications, facilitating rapid results while providing an environment similar to in vivo tissue with large surface areas for cell or biomaterial attachment, proliferation, and sensing. In addition to regenerative applications, a larger surface area can be an asset for biosensing and drug delivery applications, providing increased sensitivity and concentration range and higher drug loads.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their molecular structures can be modified either prior to or after polymerization, and they often show good biocompatibility and low toxicity. Thus, ICPs are under active investigation for diverse applications in biomedical engineering [5] including biosensing [6], cellular interfacing [7], controlled drug release [8], and tissue engineering [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their molecular structures can be modified either prior to or after polymerization, and they often show good biocompatibility and low toxicity. Thus, ICPs are under active investigation for diverse applications in biomedical engineering [5] including biosensing [6], cellular interfacing [7], controlled drug release [8], and tissue engineering [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] These constructs are envisaged to replace malfunctioning part of neural tissues or, thanks to the embedded electronics, they can constitute an organ-on-chip like platform to dynamically monitor toxicity of drugs on tissues. [17] Being inherently softer than other conductors makes them also attractive for in vivo applications. Conducting polymers minimize adverse reactions between the electronics and the tissue that carries the implant as a result of improved mechanical compliance, given that the mechanics at the level of the device architecture is optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] The versatility and flexibility of polymer synthesis also enables the production of varied scaffold architectures, in contrast to traditional metal electrodes, bridging the communication gap between biology and electronics. [27][28][29][30][31] When compared to metal electrodes, CPs have been shown to be beneficial for neural tissue engineering due to their ability to modulate material stiffness and impedance to better match that of neural tissue. [32] The lower stiffness of CPs compared to metal electrodes has been shown to improve long-term contact with neuronal cells and the electrode, by reducing the mechanical mismatch and reactive tissue response to stiff metal devices, prolonging electrical stimulation and extending beneficial effect on neuronal growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] Electroactive hydrogels have been shown to permit electrical stimulation of cells in 3D and to mediate biological signaling. [27,[37][38][39] However, continued issues with low conductivity have hindered translation of CHs into biomedical applications. [24,40,41] In the last decade, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) has dominated the CP field, due to its excellent electrical properties, chemical and thermal stability and low oxidation potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%