2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(04)00070-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4-D evolution of SE Asia’s mantle from geological reconstructions and seismic tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
243
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
22
243
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 9a, this structure extends just near the 660 km discontinuity to deep in the lower mantle with a southdipping angle, where it forms part of the large scale structure that has been interpreted as a remnant slab of late Mesozoic Tethys oceanic lithosphere prior to the India-Eurasia collision Van der Voo et al, 1999;Replumaz et al, 2004). The spatial resolution of the current data coverage does not yet allow us to establish the structural relationship between the northward dipping structure 1 and the southward dipping structure 2.…”
Section: Upper Mantle Structure Beneath India and Central Tibetmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Fig. 9a, this structure extends just near the 660 km discontinuity to deep in the lower mantle with a southdipping angle, where it forms part of the large scale structure that has been interpreted as a remnant slab of late Mesozoic Tethys oceanic lithosphere prior to the India-Eurasia collision Van der Voo et al, 1999;Replumaz et al, 2004). The spatial resolution of the current data coverage does not yet allow us to establish the structural relationship between the northward dipping structure 1 and the southward dipping structure 2.…”
Section: Upper Mantle Structure Beneath India and Central Tibetmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The southward dipping high-velocity structure 2 in the lower mantle ( Fig. 9a and b), interpreted as NeoTethys oceanic lithosphere Van der Voo et al, 1999;Replumaz et al, 2004), seems to be separated from the subducted Indian lithosphere as it sinks below 660 km discontinuity, but this relationship will be subjected to further study.…”
Section: The Seismic Evidence For Subduction Of Indian Lithospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trench advance has been observed also in the Melanesian arc system where the Ontong Java Plateau (Hall, 2002), the largest igneous province on Earth, collided with the arc between 25 Ma (Knesel et al, 2008) and 10 Ma (Mann and Taira, 2004). The overturned morphology of the subducted lithosphere inferred from tomographic images in continental collision zones like the India-Eurasia (Replumaz et al, 2004;Replumaz et al, 2010) and the Arabia-Eurasia (Faccenna et al, 2006;Hafkenscheid et al, 2006) systems suggests the occurrence of an advancing migration of the plate margin. For the advancing case, the driving forces are debated.…”
Section: Magni Et Al: Numerical Models Of Slab Migrationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The collision between Greater India and Lhasa (green) occurs at $55 Ma in the Lee and Lawver [1995] model. We chose to largely follow the subduction zone location as proposed by Replumaz et al [2004] for pre-collision times in the conventional Andean-style margin. Light gray shading represents extent of Eurasian continental crust in our model.…”
Section: Pre-collision Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The southward extent of undeformed Eurasia was based on the geometry proposed by Replumaz et al [2004] and the precollision southward extent of Lhasa based on Lee and Lawver [1995] (Figure 5, left column). The size of Greater India and the NeoTethyan intraoceanic subduction of the alternative kinematic scenario are largely based on the preferred subduction model of Hafkenscheid et al [2006], and a scenario slightly modified from that proposed by …”
Section: Kinematics Of the India-eurasia Collisionmentioning
confidence: 99%