481 km, 2.5 Gbit/s and 501 km, 622 Mbit/s unrepeateredtransmission using forward error correction and remotelypumped postamplifiers and preamplifiers

Gautheron, O.; Sian, S.S.; Grandpierre, C.; Chaudhry, M.S.; Pamart, J. L.; Barbier, T.; Bertin, Éric; Bonno, P.; Brandon, E.; Genot, M.; Marmier, P.; Mesić, Mirko; Gabla, P. M.; Bousselet, P.

doi:10.1049/el:19950249

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1996

2014

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 11 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Forward-error correction (FEC) coding was found to be an effective method to improve the system performance of optical transmission systems [8]- [15]. FEC is used in trans-oceanic transmission systems [10]- [11], or to increase the repeaterless transmission distance [8], [12]- [13]. FEC is expected to improve the system performance deteriorated by PMD [11] and to increase the tolerable PMD level accordingly.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance analysis of optical transmission system with polarization-mode dispersion and forward error correction

Lin²

1997

IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This letter shows that sufficient interleaving is essential for forward error correction to provide average bit-errorrate (BER) improvement in a high polarization-mode-dispersion (PMD) system. While error correction improves the outrage probability, in term of average BER, error correction cannot extend the tolerable PMD level and provides no performance improvement when PMD is larger than 0.2-bit interval.

show abstract