2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5D-QSAR for spirocyclic σ1 receptor ligands by Quasar receptor surface modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The receptor surface consists of many hydrophobic particles leading to many hydrophobic interactions during ligand binding. The large amount of hydrophobic interactions is in good accordance with the hydrophobic "region of bulk tolerance" of the receptor surface in the Glennon model [21].…”
Section: Pharmacophore Modelsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The receptor surface consists of many hydrophobic particles leading to many hydrophobic interactions during ligand binding. The large amount of hydrophobic interactions is in good accordance with the hydrophobic "region of bulk tolerance" of the receptor surface in the Glennon model [21].…”
Section: Pharmacophore Modelsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Pseudoreceptor model according toOberdorf et al 2010 [21].Top: Superposition of 87 spirocyclic 1 ligands (hydrogens omitted). Properties and colors of the annotation points: orange: aromatic; green: hydrophobic; blue: cationic; purple: H-bond acceptor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large amount of hydrophobic interactions supports the hypothesis that r 1 ligands interact with the steroid binding domain like region 1 (SBDL1) of the r 1 receptor protein. 51 …”
Section: Pharmacophore Models Of R 1 Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…QSAR models have been used to create models that contribute to the design of optimal hydrophobic substituents, because these groups modulate the potency of ligand affinity. Several QSAR methodologies have been used for these purposes including CoMFA , CoMSIA , 5D‐QSAR , and so on. The use of optimal descriptors is a nice alternative for including simple topological information to describe the structure–activity relationship of this kind of compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%