5G Trials on 28 GHz Band in Indonesia

Situmorang, Anna C.; Gunawan, Dadang; Anggraini, Vivi G.

doi:10.1109/wocc.2019.8770687

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers [27] and MNOs [28] have conducted trials for 5G band candidates to evaluate their deployment. The analyses revealed that the most appropriate nominee bands for the first deployment of a 5G network in Indonesia were in the 3.3-4.2 GHz band for the mid-band candidate.…”

Section: B the Weaknesses Of The Existing Indonesia Spectrummentioning

confidence: 99%

On Developing a New 5G Spectrum Usage Fee Model for Indonesia

Hikmaturokhman¹,

Ramli²,

Suryanegara³

2019

Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on the development of the 5G spectrum usage fee in Indonesia. The fee was first applied in 2010 to charge mobile network operators (MNOs) that provided cellular services. However, cellular technologies have improved rapidly from 2G, 3G, 4G to 5G, and many modern innovative cellular services demand larger spectrum bandwidth. Therefore, the existing spectrum usage fee must be revised to meet the needs of the community better and to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of spectrum use. This study modifies the characteristics of the existing cost structure of the Indonesian spectrum usage fee, designing and proposing a new 5G spectrum usage fee model to support 5G technology usage scenarios and maximize the benefits of the midband (3.5 GHz), mmWave, or high band radio frequencies (26 GHz and 28 GHz). The new spectrum usage fee model includes spectrum-sharing parameters (non-orthogonal spectrum-sharing and orthogonal spectrum sharing) and private network to optimize the use of the available spectrum because the new proposing formula does not use the nationwide population, but instead, it uses the population within a specific area with both human and non-human (machine) populations. This new model is expected to help regulators prepare 5G technology regulations for application in Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: B the Weaknesses Of The Existing Indonesia Spectrummentioning

confidence: 99%

On Developing a New 5G Spectrum Usage Fee Model for Indonesia

Hikmaturokhman¹,

Ramli²,

Suryanegara³

2019

Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…XL Axiata and Telkomsel are telecommunications companies that pioneered the deployment of 5G networks in Indonesia with trials in Jakarta using a frequency of 28 GHz and bandwidths of 100 MHz, 400 MHz and 800 MHz. The success of XL Axiata and Telkomsel's 5G network trial is used as a reference for other cellular operators and the government in providing new regulations for 5G networks in Indonesia [16]. 5G networks in Indonesia are recommended to use International Mobile Telecommunications-2020 (IMT-2020) technology and operate in the 2300 MHz or 2.3 GHz frequency band.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Throughput and Coverage Evaluation on The Use of Existing Cellular Towers for 5G Network in Surakarta City

Affandi,

Riyadi,

Prakoso

2024

J. Ilm. Tek. Elektro Komput. Dan Inform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, telecommunication operators must deploy 5G networks to cope with the exponential growth in internet-access demand. To minimize capital expenditure, existing 4G cell towers are being used to install new 5G base stations (gNodeB). However, 5G has different key performance indicators (KPI), frequency and bandwidth values, and propagation models compared to 4G hence an evaluation of this approach's effectiveness is needed. This paper analyzes 5G network performance with frequency of 3.5 GHz, bandwidth of 100 MHz, and using existing cellular towers in Surakarta City. The city has a total area of 46.8 km 2 , mostly flat topography and not many tall buildings therefore propagation models with line-of-sight urban macro (UMa) and urban micro (UMi) are representative. KPI parameters for throughput include 75% of the area served with at least 100 Mbps for downlink and at least 50 Mbps for uplink. KPI parameter for signal strength targets at least 90% of the area covered with -100 dBm or higher. Our Atoll simulations show that the optimistic scenario (UMa) produces average throughput of 153.59 Mbps (downlink) and 117.88 Mbps (uplink), 89.43% served with at least 100 Mbps (downlink) and 100% experience at least 50 Mbps (uplink), average signal strength is -83.99 dBm and 79.71% area covered with at least -100 dBm. The pessimistic scenario (UMi) predicts throughput of 141.32 Mbps (downlink) and 117.88 Mbps (uplink), 86.52% provided with at 100 Mbps (downlink) and 100% served with 50 Mbps (uplink), average signal strength of -90.73 dBm and 75.13% area covered with at least -100 dBm. It can be concluded that the 5G network installed at existing 4G towers can conform to KPI parameters on throughput but still experience drawbacks in signal coverage. A non-Standalone 5G network is suitable for early deployment, but gNodeB installation at new locations is needed in the following years.

show abstract

“…Generally, radio network planning (RNP) is a critical topic and is considered to be the primary step in implementing a wireless network such as a 5G network. The services and applications provided by 5G NR networks are grouped into three use case scenarios, namely enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), ultra-reliable and low-latency communications (uRLLC), and massive machine-type communication (mMTC), and all these use cases are applied to the Internet of Things (IoT) [7][8][9]. The level of importance of each capability in the different use cases is shown in Figure 1.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The frequency bands allocated to the 5G NR network are classified into three main categories according to Table 1: Table 1. 5G spectrum band for each scenario and use cases [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%