2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00153.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

6. Exponential Family Models for Sampled and Census Network Data

Abstract: Much progress has been made on the development of statistical methods for network analysis in the past ten years, building on the general class of exponential family random graph (ERG) network models first introduced by Holland and Leinhardt (1981). Recent examples include models for Markov graphs, “p*” models, and actor‐oriented models. For empirical application, these ERG models take a logistic form, and require the equivalent of a network census: data on all dyads within the network. In a largely separate s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, small worlds (networks characterized by bridges joining otherwise disjoint clusters) can lead to thresholds and rapid disease diffusion to distant subpopulations (Watts and Strogatz 1998; Watts 1999); skewed degree distributions (networks containing individuals with a relatively very high number of partners), can result in epidemics driven by promiscuous individuals (Liljeros et al 2001; for a critical perspective, see Jones and Handcock 2003b; Handcock and Jones 2004). While sophisticated analytic methods have recently become available that allow investigations of networks that deviated from the assumptions of the classical epidemiological model (Koehly, Goodreau, and Morris 2004), their application to context of high HIV-prevalence in SSA has been hampered by a lack of suitable data on the rate of contact between susceptible and infectious individuals ( c̄ ).…”
Section: Background: Network Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, small worlds (networks characterized by bridges joining otherwise disjoint clusters) can lead to thresholds and rapid disease diffusion to distant subpopulations (Watts and Strogatz 1998; Watts 1999); skewed degree distributions (networks containing individuals with a relatively very high number of partners), can result in epidemics driven by promiscuous individuals (Liljeros et al 2001; for a critical perspective, see Jones and Handcock 2003b; Handcock and Jones 2004). While sophisticated analytic methods have recently become available that allow investigations of networks that deviated from the assumptions of the classical epidemiological model (Koehly, Goodreau, and Morris 2004), their application to context of high HIV-prevalence in SSA has been hampered by a lack of suitable data on the rate of contact between susceptible and infectious individuals ( c̄ ).…”
Section: Background: Network Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the latter approach in this paper. Koehly, Goodreau, and Morris (2004) discuss the use of conditional log-linear models to analyze egocentric data. Handcock and Gile (2007, 2010) develop a conceptual framework for inference of network parameters from sampled data under a variety of sampling designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, one may encounter unbalanced numbers when using egocentric data for a variety of reasons (e.g., sampling, reporting errors), even though any bounded empirical population with two modes would in theory have to balance if a census were taken. When faced with this, network modelers must consider how they wish to address this (e.g., by averaging the two modes’ mean degree somehow) before proceeding (see Morris 1991; Koehly, Goodreau, and Morris 2004 for examples).…”
Section: Base Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%