2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010305801236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophic mdx mouse lacks the sarcolemmal protein dystrophin and represents a genetic homologue of human Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The present study analysed some aspects of pathological processes such as fibrosis, frequency of centralized nuclei, presence of degenerative or regenerative fibres, expression of utrophin and associated protein complexes, and myosin heavy chain isoforms in three muscles [diaphragm (DIA), gastrocnemius (GTC) and masseter (MAS)] from old male m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression of alpha-sarcoglycan ( Fig. S3 A, B ) and gamma (data not shown) was weak and scarce compared to the systematic expression in myofibers of wild- type rats [27] . Altogether, these results indicate that Dmd mdx rats are bona fide dystrophin deficient animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The expression of alpha-sarcoglycan ( Fig. S3 A, B ) and gamma (data not shown) was weak and scarce compared to the systematic expression in myofibers of wild- type rats [27] . Altogether, these results indicate that Dmd mdx rats are bona fide dystrophin deficient animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For further experiments, we used just the EDL and MAS, since they have similar fibre type compositions: EDL contains ∼ 90% IIx and IIb (Rosenblatt and Parry, 1992), and MAS is composed of ∼ 95% fast type IIx and IIb fibre types (Muller et al, 2001). We first used QPCR to compare the gene expression profiles of proliferating satellite cell-derived myoblasts (after 4 days of culture) from the EDL and MAS (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both zones are submitted to large strains during mastication and occlusion and bone remodeling was thus likely perturbed in mdx mice where deteriorated muscles cannot achieve the same force than in control mice. Yet, the fact that the effect of dystrophy is distributed all over the mandible is coherent with all muscles being affected, although possibly at various degrees [32]. This contrasts with the more localized shape differences caused by plastic response due to food consistency, focused on the parts of the mandible that are obviously involved in the masticatory process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should not have affected grinding, and accordingly neither the incisor-bearing zone nor the coronoid process are involved in this kind of phenotypic response, two zones heavily affected when the function of the incisors is modified [38]. In contrast, muscular dystrophy does not affect all muscles at the same degree [32] but all are more or less affected. Hence, all functions of the mandibles, including both chewing and grinding, are likely affected by the disease, and this would explain why phenotypic changes related to dystrophy are distributed all over the mandible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%