64.2: Hyperrealistic Display for Automotive Application

Sasaki, Takashi; Hotta, Akitoshi; Moriya, Akihisa; Murata, Takahiro; Okumura, Hajime; Horiuchi, Kazuo; Okada, Naotada; Ogawa, Makoto; Nagahara, Osamu

doi:10.1889/1.3500641

Cited by 25 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results show the advantages of monocular AR presentation for wide AR images. Previously, it has been shown that the monocular AR presentation is feasible with use of a concave reflector to focus light to one 5) . Results obtained in this study show the advantage of monocular AR over binocular AR, particularly for presenting wide AR images.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, an investigation into the operation of visual attention should be valuable in designing an AR user interface. In order to address the above problem, we have in past research proposed a "monocular AR presentation" 5,6,7) where AR images are presented only to one of an observer's eyes. We highlighted the advantage of monocular AR presentation 6) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison between Binocular and Monocular Augmented Reality Presentation in a Tracing Task

Kitamura

Naito

Kimura

et al. 2015

Eizo Joho Media Gakkaishi

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To establish the superiority of monocular presentation in augmented reality (AR) over binocular presentation, we report two experiments involving a tracing task with an AR image covering a visual field observed in both the monocular and binocular conditions. In Experiment 1, the subjective visibility of the AR image and the accuracy of the tracing task were measured. In Experiment 2, participants identified a character in the AR image while tracing. The AR image was less visible in the monocular condition than in the binocular condition. Hence, participants could observe the real world more easily in the monocular condition, and the resulting performance on the tracing task was better in the monocular condition.Information acquisition from the AR image in the monocular condition was equivalent to that in the binocular condition.These results exhibit the superiority of monocular AR presentation for the performance of manual tasks.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison between Binocular and Monocular Augmented Reality Presentation in a Tracing Task

Kitamura

Naito

Kimura

et al. 2015

Eizo Joho Media Gakkaishi

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To address this problem, we have proposed an original system with monocular AR image presentation [4], [7], [8]. An AR image is perceived differently from a real image [9], [10], and distance perception in monocular AR image presentation is different from that in binocular AR presentation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distribution of Attention in Augmented Reality: Comparison between Binocular and Monocular Presentation

Kitamura

Naito

Kimura

et al. 2014

IEICE Trans. Electron.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY This study investigated the distribution of attention to frontal space in augmented reality (AR). We conducted two experiments to compare binocular and monocular observation when an AR image was presented. According to a previous study, when participants observed an AR image in monocular presentation, they perceived the AR image as more distant than in binocular vision. Therefore, we predicted that attention would need to be shifted between the AR image and the background in not the monocular observation but the binocular one. This would enable an observer to distribute his/her visual attention across a wider space in the monocular observation. In the experiments, participants performed two tasks concurrently to measure the size of the useful field of view (UFOV). One task was letter/number discrimination in which an AR image was presented in the central field of view (the central task). The other task was luminance change detection in which dots were presented in the peripheral field of view (the peripheral task). Depth difference existed between the AR image and the location of the peripheral task in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2. The results of Experiment 1 indicated that the UFOV became wider in the monocular observation than in the binocular observation. In Experiment 2, the size of the UFOV in the monocular observation was equivalent to that in the binocular observation. It becomes difficult for a participant to observe the stimuli on the background in the binocular observation when there is depth difference between the AR image and the background. These results indicate that the monocular presentation in AR is superior to binocular presentation, and even in the best condition for the binocular condition the monocular presentation is equivalent to the binocular presentation in terms of the UFOV. key words: augmented reality, monocular observation, useful field of view, visual attention, optical see-through

show abstract

“…Taking advantage of our developed monocular type hyper reality technologies, we used the depth perception enhancement by monocular vision for development of an HUD [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monocular hyperrealistic virtual and augmented reality display

Okumura

Sasaki

Hotta

et al. 2014

2014 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Consumer Electronics Berlin (ICCE-Berlin)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We proposed and deve l oped a nove l monocu l ar hyper-realistic Head-Dome Projector: MHDP for an amusement application and a novel monocular windshield augmented reality projector: WARP for AR and head-up display (HUD) applications. They use monocular vision that eliminates the depth cues caused by binocular parallax information. Our developed MHDP and WARP system achieved a high hyper-reality performance with free depth perception and high visibility.

show abstract

64.2: Hyperrealistic Display for Automotive Application

Cited by 25 publications

References 2 publications

Comparison between Binocular and Monocular Augmented Reality Presentation in a Tracing Task

Comparison between Binocular and Monocular Augmented Reality Presentation in a Tracing Task

Distribution of Attention in Augmented Reality: Comparison between Binocular and Monocular Presentation

Monocular hyperrealistic virtual and augmented reality display

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About