74 Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on enteric methane production and apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility of beef cattle.

Henry, Darren D; Ciriaco, Francine M; Araújo, Rafael Canonenco de; Fontes, P. L. P.; Oosthuizen, Nicola; Garcia-Ascolani, M. E.; Sanford, Carla D; Schulmeister, Tessa M; Martin, Rodolpho; Dubeux, José C. B.; Rostoll-Cangiano, L; Lamb, G. C.; DiLorenzo, Nicolás

doi:10.1093/jas/sky404.874

Cited by 2 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is unclear how BSS may be increasing OMD and DMD. The data observed in the current experiment is not in agreement with previous reports from Henry et al (2018a); therefore, more research should be done to further study the effect of BSS on DMD and OMD on ruminants.…”

Section: Effects On Apparent Total Tract Nutrient Digestibilitycontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…observed that adding BSS above 0.33% of the substrate DM can reduce IVOMD linearly; however, the authors did not observed a difference between 0.00 % and 0.33% of the substrate DM. Moreover, it has also been observed that BSS may not affect apparent total tract digestibility of OM (Henry et al, 2018a). It is unclear how BSS may be increasing OMD and DMD.…”

Section: Effects On Apparent Total Tract Nutrient Digestibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on feedlot beef cattle production

Mejia-Turcios

Osorio-Doblado

Urso

et al. 2021

Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two experiments were performed to evaluate the effects of bismuth subsalicylate (BSS) and calcium-ammonium nitrate (CAN) on in vitro ruminal fermentation, growth, apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients, liver mineral concentration, and carcass quality of beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 4 ruminally cannulated steers [520 ± 30 kg body weight (BW)] were used as donors to perform a batch culture and an in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) procedure. Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial with factors being BSS [0 or 0.33% of substrate dry matter (DM)] and CAN (0 or 2.22% of substrate DM). In Exp. 2, 200 Angus-crossbred steers (385 ± 27 kg BW) were blocked by BW and allocated to 50 pens (4 steers/pen) in a randomized complete block design with a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors included BSS (0 or 0.33% of the diet DM) and non-protein nitrogen (NPN) source [urea or encapsulated CAN (eCAN) included at 0.68 or 2.0% of the diet, respectively] with 0.28% ruminally available S (RAS). A low S diet was included as a positive control containing urea (0.68% of DM) and 0.14% RAS. For Exp. 1, data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with the fixed effects of BSS, CAN, BSS × CAN, and the random effect of donor. For Exp. 2, the MIXED procedure of SAS was used for continuous variables and the GLIMMIX procedure for categorical data. For Exp. 1, no differences (P > 0.230) were observed for IVOMD. There was a tendency (P = 0.055) for an interaction regarding H2S production. Acetate:propionate increased (P = 0.003) with the addition of CAN. In Exp. 2, there was a NPN source effect (P = 0.032) where steers consuming urea had greater carcass-adjusted final shrunk BW than those consuming eCAN. Intake of DM (P < 0.001) and carcass-adjusted average daily gain (P = 0.024) were reduced by eCAN; however, it did not affect (P = 0.650) carcass-adjusted feed efficiency. Steers consuming urea had greater (P = 0.032) hot carcass weight, and a BSS × NPN interaction (P = 0.019) was observed on calculated yield grade. Apparent absorption of S decreased (P < 0.001) with the addition of BSS. Final liver Cu concentration was reduced (P = 0.042) by 58% in cattle fed BSS, indicating that BSS may decrease Cu absorption and storage in the liver. The results observed in this experiment indicate that BSS does not have negative effects on feedlot steer performance whereas CAN may hinder performance of steers fed finishing diets.

show abstract

Section: Effects On Apparent Total Tract Nutrient Digestibilitycontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Effects On Apparent Total Tract Nutrient Digestibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on feedlot beef cattle production

Mejia-Turcios

Osorio-Doblado

Urso

et al. 2021

Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A PRISMA statement according to Liberati et al (2009) has been provided (Supplemental Figure S1, https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2020 -18541). Of the 56 treatment means, 35 treatment means related to beef cattle (Hulshof et al, 2012;Newbold et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015;Troy et al, 2015;Henry, 2017;Lee et al, 2017a,b;Capelari, 2018;Duthie et al, 2018;Tomkins et al, 2018;Alemu et al, 2019;Granja-Salcedo et al, 2019;Rebelo et al, 2019;Villar et al, 2020) and 21 treatment means related to dairy cattle (van Zijderveld et al, 2011b;Guyader et al, 2015a,b;Veneman et al, 2015;Klop et al, 2016;Olijhoek et al, 2016;van Wyngaard et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018;Meller et al, 2019;van Wyngaard et al, 2019; Table 1). All beef cattle in the selected studies were steers except in Lee et al (2015), which were beef heifers.…”

Section: Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All beef cattle in the selected studies were steers except in Lee et al (2015), which were beef heifers. Studies in 2 articles used beef cattle at the backgrounding phase (Lee et al, 2017a;Alemu et al, 2019), studies in 4 articles used cattle in the growing stage (Lee et Feng et al: ANTIMETHANOGENIC EFFECT OF NITRATE IN CATTLE 11377 al., 2015;Capelari, 2018;Duthie et al, 2018;Rebelo et al, 2019), studies in 4 articles used cattle at the finishing phase (Troy et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2017b;Granja-Salcedo et al, 2019;Villar et al, 2020), 1 study used 2-yr-old steers (Tomkins et al, 2018), whereas 3 articles did not report type of beef cattle (Hulshof et al, 2012;Newbold et al, 2014;Henry, 2017). Diets included grazing pasture in 4 studies (van Wyngaard et al, 2018;Granja-Salcedo et al, 2019;van Wyngaard et al, 2019), or feed delivered to cattle in housed pens and stalls (all others; 52 studies).…”

Section: Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nitrate was provided in various forms. It was either mixed with concentrates and provided in pelleted form (Guyader et al, 2015a,b;van Wyngaard et al, 2018;van Wyngaard et al, 2019), mixed with molasses as a carrier (Henry, 2017;Tomkins et al, 2018), offered as encapsulated nitrate (Lee et al, 2015;Henry, 2017;Lee et al, 2017a,b;Alemu et al, 2019;Granja-Salcedo et al, 2019;Rebelo et al, 2019), or directly delivered with the diets (all others). In Lee et al (2017a), 2 treatments had encapsulated nitrate, and 1 treatment used un-encapsulated nitrate; in Lee et al (2017b), 1 treatment had encapsulated nitrate, and 1 treatment had un-encapsulated nitrate.…”

Section: Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Antimethanogenic effects of nitrate supplementation in cattle: A meta-analysis

Feng

Dijkstra

Bannink

et al. 2020

Journal of Dairy Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supplementing a diet with nitrate is regarded as an effective and promising methane (CH 4 ) mitigation strategy by competing with methanogens for available hydrogen through its reduction of ammonia in the rumen. Studies have shown major reductions in CH 4 emissions with nitrate supplementation, but with large variation in response. The objective of this study was to quantitatively investigate the effect of dietary nitrate on enteric CH 4 production and yield and evaluate the variables with high potential to explain the heterogeneity of between-study variability using meta-analytical models. A data set containing 56 treatments from 24 studies was developed to conduct a meta-analysis. Dry matter (DM) intake, nitrate dose (g/kg of DM), animal body weight, roughage proportion of diet, dietary crude protein and neutral detergent fiber content, CH 4 measurement technique, and type of cattle (beef or dairy) were considered as explanatory variables. Average DM intake and CH 4 production for dairy cows (16.2 ± 2.93 kg/d; 311 ± 58.8 g/d) were much higher than for beef cattle (8.1 ± 1.57 kg/d; 146 ± 50.9 g/d). Therefore, a relative mean difference was calculated and used to conduct random-effect and mixed-effect model analysis to eliminate the large variations between types of animal due to intake. The final mixed-effect model for CH 4 production (g of CH 4 /d) had 3 explanatory variables and included nitrate dose, type of cattle, and DM intake. The final mixed-effect model for CH 4 yield (g of CH 4 /kg of DM intake) had 2 explanatory variables and included nitrate dose and type of cattle. Nitrate effect sizes on CH 4 production (dairy: −20.4 ± 1.89%; beef: −10.1 ± 1.52%) and yield (dairy: −15.5 ± 1.15%; beef: −8.95 ± 1.764%) were significantly different between the 2 types of cattle. When data from slow-release nitrate sources were removed from the analysis, there was no significant difference in type of cattle anymore for CH 4 production and yield. Nitrate dose enhanced the mitigating effect of nitrate on CH 4 production and yield by 0.911 ± 0.1407% and 0.728 ± 0.2034%, respectively, for every 1 g/kg of DM increase from its mean dietary inclusion (16.7 g/kg of DM). An increase of 1 kg of DM/d in DM intake from its mean dietary intake (11.1 kg of DM/d) decreased the effect of nitrate on CH 4 production by 0.691 ± 0.2944%. Overall, this metaanalysis demonstrated that nitrate supplementation reduces CH 4 production and yield in a dose-dependent manner, and that elevated DM intake decreases the effect of nitrate supplementation on CH 4 production. Furthermore, the stronger antimethanogenic effect on CH 4 production and yield in dairy cows than in beef steers could be related to use of slow-release nitrate in beef cattle.

show abstract

74 Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on enteric methane production and apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility of beef cattle.

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on feedlot beef cattle production

Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on feedlot beef cattle production

Antimethanogenic effects of nitrate supplementation in cattle: A meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About