1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009967130889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on available published data, no difference in implantation or total procedure time, implant parameters, defibrillator threshold testing, or long-term complications have been found comparing submuscular to subpectoral pocked device replacement. 2,3 In our experience over the last 10 years with this technique, we have found no increased risk of complications, such as hematoma formation or pain postdevice implantation. We have heard anecdotally of an increased risk of lead Figure 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Based on available published data, no difference in implantation or total procedure time, implant parameters, defibrillator threshold testing, or long-term complications have been found comparing submuscular to subpectoral pocked device replacement. 2,3 In our experience over the last 10 years with this technique, we have found no increased risk of complications, such as hematoma formation or pain postdevice implantation. We have heard anecdotally of an increased risk of lead Figure 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%