9. From argument analysis to cultural keywords (and back again)

Rigotti, Eddo; Rocci, Andrea

doi:10.1075/cvs.2.11rig

Cited by 37 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…He was also one of the first scholars to use corpus-based approaches in relation to argumentation analysis (Stubbs, 1996;2001) (though this is not a sustained focus). Stubbs' approach has been criticised by the argumentation theorists, Eddo Rigotti and Andrea Rocci (Rigotti and Rocci, 2005). In relation to my corpus-based argumentation analysis, this article takes cues from Stubbs' corpus-based work (see Section 3) and its unfolding is affected by engagement with Rigotti and Rocci's (2005) I regard this as an explanation-an explanation of why people from the new member states would want to come to the UK, e.g., because there are available jobs and the social benefit system is an attraction.…”

Section: Corpus Methods Of Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stubbs' approach has been criticised by the argumentation theorists, Eddo Rigotti and Andrea Rocci (Rigotti and Rocci, 2005). In relation to my corpus-based argumentation analysis, this article takes cues from Stubbs' corpus-based work (see Section 3) and its unfolding is affected by engagement with Rigotti and Rocci's (2005) I regard this as an explanation-an explanation of why people from the new member states would want to come to the UK, e.g., because there are available jobs and the social benefit system is an attraction. It is not an argument because, in line with Walton's definition, it is not setting out to persuade readers that Eastern Europeans will want to come to the UK.…”

Section: Corpus Methods Of Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since, as I said in Section 1, this article takes cues from Stubbs' work on keywords and its unfolding is affected by engagement with Rigotti and Rocci (2005), in the next section I will set out Stubbs' perspective and my response to Rigotti and Rocci's critique.…”

Section: Relationship Between Corpus Comparative Statistical Abstractmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the next section, I take one cue from Rigotti and Rocci's (2005) critique. Text structure, and thus grammatical word meaning, is an important consideration in how I identify strategies in The Sun corpus; in turn, this will feed into how I recover implicit premises.…”

Section: Enthymematic Argument Structure and Cultural Abstractmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To help with discriminating different types of keyword, I shall refer to this sort as a cultural keyword (as indeed does Stubbs, 1996;2001). This concept of keyword is used in the argumentation work of Rigotti and Rocci (2005)-see section 4.…”

Section: Cultural Abstractmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: A corpus-based reconstruction

O’Halloran¹

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on an explanation in a newspaper article: why new European Union citizens will come to the UK from Eastern Europe (e.g., because of available jobs). Using a corpus-based method of analysis, I show how regular target readers have been positioned to generate premises in dialogue with the explanation propositions, and thus into an understanding of the explanation as an argument, one which contains a biased conclusion not apparent in the text. Employing this method, and in particular 'corpus comparative statistical keywords', I show how two issues can be freshly looked at: implicit premise recovery; the argument/explanation disRésumé: J'emploie un logiciel qui analyse quantitativement un article (dont le but est d'expliquer pourquoi des citoyens de la nouvelle Europe vont quitter l'Europe de l'Est pour aller habiter au Royaume-Uni) de journal pour démontrer que son auditoire cible régulier est influencé à produire des prémisses dans un dialogue contenant des explications, et ainsi à interpréter des explications comme si elles étaient des arguments. Cette approche apporte une nouvelle optique sur l'identification des pré-misses implicites et sur la distinction entre des arguments et des explications.tinction.

show abstract

Section: Corpus Methods Of Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Corpus Methods Of Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Relationship Between Corpus Comparative Statistical Abstractmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Enthymematic Argument Structure and Cultural Abstractmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cultural Abstractmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: A corpus-based reconstruction

O’Halloran¹

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Advanced Theoretical Perspectives and Open Questions

Rigotti

Greco

2018

Argumentation Library

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Literature Review

Born

2024

Springer Business Cases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter delineates the research space and highlights significant conceptual contributions to the fields of storytelling and argumentation, as these are the primary lenses through which the case study is analyzed. Section 2.1 delves into the concept of trust and explains related terms such as confidence, credibility, image, and reputation. Section 2.2 explores storytelling from a broad historical perspective, discussing influential narrative structures, some of whose origins date back centuries. Section 2.3 examines argumentation with a focus on the pragma-dialectical approach and outlines the steps and tools critical to argumentative reconstruction in case analysis. In addition, it addresses key points of attack relevant to counter argumentation, which are of particular importance for the analysis of the crisis episode in the case study.

show abstract

9. From argument analysis to cultural keywords (and back again)

Cited by 37 publications

References 0 publications

Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: A corpus-based reconstruction

Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: A corpus-based reconstruction

Advanced Theoretical Perspectives and Open Questions

Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About