2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1013263601704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the voltage-current characteristics were monitored while the potential difference ranging from -800 to 800 mV was applied stepwise to the membrane. When studying the dependence of the conductance of a single conical pore on pH, we found a minimum of conductance at pH 3.86, which agreed with data on the isoelectric point for track PET membranes for pH values of 3.7-3.8 [6,7]. To demonstrate the cation selectivity of the pores obtained by etching the PET membranes, we determined transfer numbers ( t + ) in multipore membranes using a tenfold concentration gradient (0.1 M/0.01 M) KCl at pH 8 for all solutions used.…”
Section: Biochemistry Biophysics and Molecular Biologysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, the voltage-current characteristics were monitored while the potential difference ranging from -800 to 800 mV was applied stepwise to the membrane. When studying the dependence of the conductance of a single conical pore on pH, we found a minimum of conductance at pH 3.86, which agreed with data on the isoelectric point for track PET membranes for pH values of 3.7-3.8 [6,7]. To demonstrate the cation selectivity of the pores obtained by etching the PET membranes, we determined transfer numbers ( t + ) in multipore membranes using a tenfold concentration gradient (0.1 M/0.01 M) KCl at pH 8 for all solutions used.…”
Section: Biochemistry Biophysics and Molecular Biologysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The ion exchange capacity and water content also provide values for the membrane hydration number ( n m , mol H 2 O/mol -SO 3 − ) [ 63 ], which is the average number of water molecules per functional group. The n m is calculated according to the formula [ 63 , 65 ]: where M w is the molar weight of water (18 g mol −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%