2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1014710504963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The mechanical behavior of porcine pericardium was analyzed to compare it with that of calf pericardium employed in valve leaflets for cardiac bioprostheses. Forty samples of pericardium were subjected to uniaxial tensile testing, 20 as controls and 20 exposed to loads increasing stepwise from 0.5 to 1.5 kg and to 3 kg, and thereafter to rupture, with a return to zero load between each new increment. Another 20 samples were used in biaxial tensile tests involving the application of loads increasing stepwise (t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength measured here (standard deviation in parentheses) of 19.1 ( σ = 2.2) MPa for adult and 32.9 ( σ = 4.1) MPa for neonatal pericardium is less than that reported previously for unfixed bovine pericardium of 25–29 MPa and of unfixed porcine pericardium of 22-23 MPa [37, 38] but greater than that reported in a different study for calf pericardium at 6–9 months of 11.5 ± 4.6 MPa [39]. We report the ultimate tensile strength as a modulus, that is, tissue property per cross-sectional area.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The strength measured here (standard deviation in parentheses) of 19.1 ( σ = 2.2) MPa for adult and 32.9 ( σ = 4.1) MPa for neonatal pericardium is less than that reported previously for unfixed bovine pericardium of 25–29 MPa and of unfixed porcine pericardium of 22-23 MPa [37, 38] but greater than that reported in a different study for calf pericardium at 6–9 months of 11.5 ± 4.6 MPa [39]. We report the ultimate tensile strength as a modulus, that is, tissue property per cross-sectional area.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Garcia Páez et. al investigated and compared the mechanical properties of GL-treated BP and PP tissues between 2001 and 2003 through the use of a hydraulic simulator, as well as uniaxial and biaxial loading [12, 13, 15, 31]. However, the biaxial testing conducted in these papers differs from the biaxial testing conducted in this study, resembling a membrane inflation test, in addition to lacking the multi-protocol aspect of the biaxial trials performed by our group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…BP and PP mechanical properties have been shown to differ as a result of the intrinsic tissue structural variability, selection and mounting of the samples into the testing device and/or due to altered treatment and testing protocols [12, 13, 15, 2931]. Garcia Páez et.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical properties of glutaraldehyde-treated BP and PP, have been investigated and characterized primarily through uniaxial and biaxial tensile tests (3, 2027), which are both planar tests. Studies on the out-of-plane, flexural behavior of pericardia are limited (28, 29) despite the critical role leaflet bending plays in bioprosthetic heart valve function and durability (30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%