1995
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/40/1/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: We have developed a method for the quantification of breast texture by using different algorithms to classify mammograms into the four patterns described by Wolfe (N1, P1, P2 and Dy). The computerized scheme employs craniocaudal views of conventional screen-film mammograms, which are digitized by a laser scanner. We used discriminant analysis to select among different feature-extraction techniques, including Fourier transform, local-contrast analysis, and grey-level distribution and quantification. The method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, subjectively-rated mammographic density using BIRADS has been found unreliable due to considerable inter- and intra-observer variability among radiologists (23). In order to achieve more reliable and consistent mammographic density assessment results, a number of research groups have developed various computerized schemes to detect and quantify mammographic density (24-34). In these previous researches, different image features and machine learning-based classifiers were investigated and compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subjectively-rated mammographic density using BIRADS has been found unreliable due to considerable inter- and intra-observer variability among radiologists (23). In order to achieve more reliable and consistent mammographic density assessment results, a number of research groups have developed various computerized schemes to detect and quantify mammographic density (24-34). In these previous researches, different image features and machine learning-based classifiers were investigated and compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since visual assessment of mammographic density into four BIRADS categories is difficult and often inaccurate due to the large inter-observer variability [10], a number of research groups have developed computerized algorithms and schemes to detect and quantify breast tissue density based on a variety of features including the image statistic features of the pixel values, such as mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, entropy, and the other higher order momentum based measures, computed from the original and/or processed images, the mathematical morphology and texture based features, such as power spectrum and fractal dimension [1118]. For example, Zhou et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have developed the computerized methods for the assessment of mammographic patterns [18][19][20][21][22]. In case of whole breast US images, computerized methods for assessing parenchymal patterns will probably be useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%